1968
DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1968.tb11924.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further Comments on the Theory of Grain Growth in Porous Compacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later Nichols [5] derived a more appropriate equation for the drag force, Eq. (13) in Part 1, which was applied by Brook [6,7] to consideration of normal grain growth kinetics controlled by pore migration.…”
Section: Phenomenological Considerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later Nichols [5] derived a more appropriate equation for the drag force, Eq. (13) in Part 1, which was applied by Brook [6,7] to consideration of normal grain growth kinetics controlled by pore migration.…”
Section: Phenomenological Considerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of bubble-boundary separation presented above does not yield the bubble drag in low-velocity migration easily, so we use the older, phenomenological approximation, which has been discussed by Shewmon (1964), Kingery and Francois (1965), Nichols (1966Nichols ( , 1968, and Brook (1969), among others. Using the analysis of Shewmon (1964), the bubble-drag force in the low-velocity regime, P b , is (30) where Nb is the number of bubbles per grain boundary 2nR 2 is the area per grain boundary (the other 2TlR2 of ~ spherical grain is allocated to adjacent grains), and F b , the drag force per bubble, is given by…”
Section: Alley and Others: Grain Growth In Polar Icementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the gas bubbles in UO 2 Baker's data [4] show that small intragranular fission gas bubbles (average diameter $2 nm), formed during the irradiation were virtually immobile on subsequent annealing at temperatures <1500°C. With the growth of a bubble radius from 2 to $10 nm, the bubble diffusivity increases, in contradiction with the standard theoretical predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The bubble mobility is described by the bubble diffusion coefficient which depends on the bubble radius R b . This dependence is different for the various diffusion mechanisms [1,2]. The bubble mobility in UO 2 is largest for the surface diffusion mechanism (at least for bubbles with R b 6 10 lm) and is inversely proportional to R À4 b , whereas a slower dependence on the bubble radius (/ R À3 b ) is typical for the two other mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation