1936
DOI: 10.1039/tf9363201333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further considerations on the thermodynamics of chemical equilibria and reaction rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
393
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 651 publications
(411 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
18
393
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These states are easier to both measure and compute, and can be related to the transition state by linear free energy relationships (LFERs). LFERs are a phenomenological model used to describe the linear behavior that may exist between the logarithm of the reaction rates and equilibrium constants for a series of reactions: [49][50][51] ln ln k a K b  , where k denotes the kinetic rate constant, K denotes the thermodynamic equilibrium constant, and a and b are constants. These can be equivalently written in terms of the activation free energies…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These states are easier to both measure and compute, and can be related to the transition state by linear free energy relationships (LFERs). LFERs are a phenomenological model used to describe the linear behavior that may exist between the logarithm of the reaction rates and equilibrium constants for a series of reactions: [49][50][51] ln ln k a K b  , where k denotes the kinetic rate constant, K denotes the thermodynamic equilibrium constant, and a and b are constants. These can be equivalently written in terms of the activation free energies…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[73] Based on the reactions of Table 7, the group additive method outperforms models such as Evans-Polanyi correlations. [15,16] Applying an Evans-Polanyi relation obtained from the reactions in Tables 3 and 4 for the prediction of the 300 K activation energies of Table 7, an average overestimation of the ab initio activation energies of 4.3 kJ mol -1 is found, compared to an overestimation by 1.3 kJ mol -1 for the group additive method (see Figures S1-S2 in Supporting Information). Group additivity clearly improves the agreement with the ab initio activation energy, and the method is moreover capable of predicting pre-exponential factors in contrast to the Evans-Polanyi method.…”
Section: Ab Initio Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore a variety of methods for rate prediction of radical reactions has been developed. These methods range from correlating the activation energy to the reaction enthalpy, such as Evans-Polanyi correlations and its variations, [15][16][17] to more sophisticated methods based on the structure of the transition state. Several of the latter methods are related to Benson group 2 additivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, similar parabola models can be used for the explanation of the Bell-Evans-Polanyi principle (a linear model is sufficient, though), the Marcus equation, Hammond's postulate, and the relationship of low-curvature directions with low barrier energies. [39][40][41][42][43][44][45] In such a parabola model, the transition state is given by the intercept (ξ, E(ξ)) of both parabolas. From Fig.…”
Section: Correlating Transition State Energies With Structural DImentioning
confidence: 99%