1999
DOI: 10.1076/jcen.21.4.572.882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further Crossvalidation of Regression-Based Neuropsychological Norms with an Update for the Boston Naming Test

Abstract: Regression-based norms for the Trail Making Test, Boston Naming Test, and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, which we published in 1991 and 1993, have been criticized by Fastenau (1998) as having overcorrected for demographic influences in a sample of 63 older adults. We present data from new, independent participant samples that are consistent with expectations from the regression-based norms. We propose that Fastenau's findings in this instance resulted from the nonrepresentative nature of his relatively small sam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data reveal a moderate effect of educational level, which may account at least in part for differences in total TYM scores between the current study and Brown et al [6] who did not report education-related data. Yet, educational level has been shown to be a significant variable in cognitive testing [35,36]. A large number of studies highlight the impact of literacy on cognitive performance, as it is measured by screening instruments, reporting lower scores with lower educational level in advanced age [37,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data reveal a moderate effect of educational level, which may account at least in part for differences in total TYM scores between the current study and Brown et al [6] who did not report education-related data. Yet, educational level has been shown to be a significant variable in cognitive testing [35,36]. A large number of studies highlight the impact of literacy on cognitive performance, as it is measured by screening instruments, reporting lower scores with lower educational level in advanced age [37,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…was administered several additional tests to further document his cognitive abilities. He showed anomia on the Boston Naming Test (Kaplan et al, 1983) on which he correctly named only 34 of 60 objects without cueing (T 5 16; Heaton et al, 1999), although he named an additional 16 items with phonetic cues. He was able to provide accurate verbal descriptions of all objects that he was unable to name (e.g., igloo: "made of snow, Eskimo live in it"; abacus: "used for counting in ancient times"), indicating that he recognized the objects perceptually and had access to related semantic information.…”
Section: Neuropsychological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 This normative set has poor representation of individuals over 54 years old or individuals with less than a high school education; consequently, for individuals over 54, alternative published normative data were used. [19][20][21][22] Normative data for the RCF were taken from alternative published norms for individuals over 59 and the main MACS normative set for individuals under 60. 23 Normative data for the CalCap and Odd Man Out have not been reported for individuals over 54 years old; thus utility of these scores was minimized among this age group.…”
Section: Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%