1984
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1984.tb01706.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further development and use of an automatic recording system in sheep grazing studies

Abstract: Comparisons between some aspects of grazing and ruminating behaviour by sheep recorded automatically and by manual observation are reported.Behaviour was recorded manually and automatically on four swards with surface heights of 3, 6. 9 and 12 cm. The automatic recording method gave significantly higher biting rates (78 v 67 + 2-4 bites min^') than manual recording. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed. For recordings during ruminating there was no significant difference between the two recordi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This implied, from the intake data, that bite size also decreased. The biting rates found generally fall within tbe range of those previously reported (Allden and Whittaker, 1970;Jamieson and Hodgson, 1979;Chambers et al, 1981) and the relationship between SSH and biting rate (Equation 4) is similar to that reported for continuously stocked swards (Penning et at.. 1984). Mastications increased up to a SSH of about 90 mm and thereafter there was little further increase.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This implied, from the intake data, that bite size also decreased. The biting rates found generally fall within tbe range of those previously reported (Allden and Whittaker, 1970;Jamieson and Hodgson, 1979;Chambers et al, 1981) and the relationship between SSH and biting rate (Equation 4) is similar to that reported for continuously stocked swards (Penning et at.. 1984). Mastications increased up to a SSH of about 90 mm and thereafter there was little further increase.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…At low herbage allowances reduced intake reduces milk production by ewes (Gibb and Treacher. 1978) and this causes an increase in herbage intake by the lambs (Penning and Gibb, 1979). In this experiment, however, lambs were probably unable to increase their intake of herbage at low allowances, because oflow herbage availability and competition with the ewes (Gibb f/Q/., 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The graphical model considers prehension and mastication to be incompatible activities. For sheep, this is supported by the observations of Penning et al, (1984) that the movement of the jaw differs for prehension and mastication bites. For cattle, the relationship between prehension and mastication bites has not been elucidated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In addition, bite rates are difficult to determine accurately as mandible movements can be missed easily by the observer. Remote sensing systems have attempted to quantify ingestion rates using various animal-attached transducers to eliminate the need for visual observations (Penning, 1983; Penning, Steel & Johnson, 1984; Beauchemin et al, 1989; Matsui & Okubo, 1991; Abijaoudé et al, 1999; Desnoyers et al, 2009), which, though useful in detecting the initiation and duration of feeding, have encountered difficulties in classifying jaw movements into either biting (acquiring food) or chewing (processing/masticating food). Such equipment also tends to be bulky and poorly transferrable between different individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%