2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further developments in molecular sex assignment: a blind test of 18th and 19th century human skeletons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it has been reported that 100% of successful sex determinations by osteological measurements only occur when the skeleton is from an adult, it is complete, it is in good condition of preservation, and the morphometric variability in the population to which it belongs is known [46]–[48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, it has been reported that 100% of successful sex determinations by osteological measurements only occur when the skeleton is from an adult, it is complete, it is in good condition of preservation, and the morphometric variability in the population to which it belongs is known [46]–[48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods to sex determination have been proposed such as anthropometric measurements of the limbs [36] [39] , hands [40] , [41] , and from length of index and ring finger, and the index and ring finger ratio [42] [45] . Nevertheless, it has been reported that 100% of successful sex determinations by osteological measurements only occur when the skeleton is from an adult, it is complete, it is in good condition of preservation, and the morphometric variability in the population to which it belongs is known [46] – [48] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in recent years ancient DNA (aDNA) testing has revolutionized bioarchaeological research, and has become widely used for sex estimation in archaeological material (Faerman et al, ; Stone, Milner, Pääbo, & Stoneking ; and more recently Álvarez‐Sandoval, Manzanilla, & Montiel, ; Inskip et al, ). If aDNA is sufficiently preserved and amplified genetic approaches, when used individually or in combination, have demonstrated 100% accuracy in tests on known‐sex individuals (Daskalaki, Anderung, Humphrey, & Götherström, ; Skoglund, Storå, Götherström, & Jakobsson, ). Earlier methods include PCR approaches that target a single locus with X‐Y homology, such as the amelogenin gene (Daskalaki et al, ), or a set of YSTR loci (Tierney & Bird, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If aDNA is sufficiently preserved and amplified genetic approaches, when used individually or in combination, have demonstrated 100% accuracy in tests on known‐sex individuals (Daskalaki, Anderung, Humphrey, & Götherström, ; Skoglund, Storå, Götherström, & Jakobsson, ). Earlier methods include PCR approaches that target a single locus with X‐Y homology, such as the amelogenin gene (Daskalaki et al, ), or a set of YSTR loci (Tierney & Bird, ). More recent approaches are based on the assessment of shotgun sequence reads mapping to Y versus X chromosome (Skoglund et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the biological sex of an individual can be assessed by determining the sex chromosomal karyotype. In the case of DNA derived from ancient human remains, a method has been proposed that identifies sex by considering the number of reads in shotgun DNA sequencing data that align to the X and Y chromosomes [ 1 ], which is advantageous over previous PCR-based approaches that targeted sex-specific markers [ 2 4 ] and that can easily be compromised by modern contamination [ 5 ]. However, this method relies on at least 100,000 sequences mapping to the human genome for accurate assignment, a prohibitive requirement for many badly preserved ancient remains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%