Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2676723.2677241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further Evaluations of Industry-Inspired Pair Programming Communication Guidelines with Undergraduate Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Allotting extra time to pair programming activities, as well as providing feedback on collaboration from prior sessions, may help mitigate this concern [17]. Formally introducing pair programming best practices to students prior to a collaborative task has also been shown to improve the quality of the collaboration, encouraging communication and active contribution from both partners [22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Allotting extra time to pair programming activities, as well as providing feedback on collaboration from prior sessions, may help mitigate this concern [17]. Formally introducing pair programming best practices to students prior to a collaborative task has also been shown to improve the quality of the collaboration, encouraging communication and active contribution from both partners [22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collaboration has emerged as a central component of many computationally intense jobs and is now a component of many computer science curricula [1]. Pair programming offers a structured form of collaboration for computer science learning that has been successfully used in a wide variety of K-12 and postsecondary computer science courses [9,16,21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Falmouth University and Robert Gordon University, together, have been exploring solutions to these challenges. While conducting previous research [7,12,8], the authors observed that students seemed to engage in peer support more readily, and were less intimidated by logic errors, when programming robots. Such activity seemed to evoke a sense of mastery, belonging, and agency, in line with building motivation according to self-determination theory [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%