“…The first set comprised 1,180 SNPs related to disorders or traits that are likely a priori to be associated with the different endophenotypes. These were identified through MEDLINE and included meta‐ and mega‐analyses of alcohol (Wang et al., ) and drug (C. Y. Li et al., ) dependence, cocaine abuse (Clarke et al., ), smoking and nicotine dependence (Belsky et al., ; Bierut et al., ; Furberg et al., ; Liu, Tozzi et al., ; Thorgeirsson et al., ), ADHD (B. M. Neale et al., ), schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression (Greenwood et al., ; Hek et al., ; Ripke et al., ; Smoller et al., ; Sullivan, Daly, & O'Donovan, ), or related phenotypes, such as heavy drinking (Heath et al., ) and the maximum number of drinks consumed at one time (Kapoor et al., ; Pan et al., ), and the personality characteristic of excitement seeking (Terracciano et al., ).The second candidate SNP set was different for each investigation, consisting of SNPs that have been reported in previous research to be associated with the specific endophenotypes investigated. SNPs in either of these two sets that were not on the Illumina array were imputed, using the program Minimac (Howie, Fuchsberger, Stephens, Marchini, & Abecasis, ), after genotypes had first been phased using Beagle (Browning & Browning, ), which uses known familial structure to improve phasing accuracy.…”