1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.1989.tb01152.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further Evidence for the Presence of A Antigen on Group B Erythrocytes through the Use of Specific Exoglycosidases

Abstract: Certain antibodies have shown the ability to detect small amounts of A antigenic structures on certain group B cells. These rare cells that reverse group as B, are designated here as B(A) cells. Among the anti-A antibodies capable of detecting these cells are MHO4 (an IgM murine monoclonal antibody) and polyclonal anti-A derived from blood group O donors. The latter (anti-A, B) have been adsorbed exhaustively with normal B cells, to deplete the serum of antibodies to group B antigen. The cell specificity detec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They fail to react with normal group B cells (native) and with native or papaintreated group O cells. The B(A) reactions have been re ported to be specifically inhibited by A substance [1].We report here confirmation of the A-specific inhibition of MH04 anti-A and polyclonal anti-A from O serum ad sorbed with B cells and present further evidence for the presence of A antigens on group B cells, obtained through the use of highly purified exoglycosidases [5]. The glyco sidases used in these studies were an a-galactosidase (B-zyme) obtained from green coffee beans [6] and an a-N-acetylgalactosaminidase (A-zyme) isolated from chicken liver [7].…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…They fail to react with normal group B cells (native) and with native or papaintreated group O cells. The B(A) reactions have been re ported to be specifically inhibited by A substance [1].We report here confirmation of the A-specific inhibition of MH04 anti-A and polyclonal anti-A from O serum ad sorbed with B cells and present further evidence for the presence of A antigens on group B cells, obtained through the use of highly purified exoglycosidases [5]. The glyco sidases used in these studies were an a-galactosidase (B-zyme) obtained from green coffee beans [6] and an a-N-acetylgalactosaminidase (A-zyme) isolated from chicken liver [7].…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…Due to the weak reactions seen with B RBCs, which can also be observed in tube assays or the column agglutination test (gel cards), ES‐15 was previously deemed to be an anti‐A,B monoclonal reagent 44 . However, the specificity of this reactivity was confirmed by treatment of group B RBCs with exoglycosidase specific for A antigen after which these cells typed and stained negatively with ES‐15 20,21 . We were unable to reproduce the weak B reactivity once reported 45 in group A 1 RBCs with the anti‐B clone BS‐85.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As expected when tested with anti‐A, group A 1 , A 2 , A 1 B, and A 2 B RBCs were clearly positive and group O RBCs negative. Group B RBCs were very weakly but still distinctly positive when tested with anti‐A due to the small amount of A antigen naturally present on B RBCs 21 . When testing with anti‐B, positive reactions were seen with B, A 1 B, and A 2 B RBCs while negative reactions were obtained with A 1 , A 2 , and O RBCs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of A1 (B)-enhanced tests, especially protease enzymes, demonstrated the presence of a little B on all adult AI red cells just as protease enzyme B (A) tests have demonstrated a little A on all adult B cells (Beck et al, 1987;Stroup & Treacy, 1987;Voak et al, 1988;Goldstein et al, 1989). We could not however, demonstrate A1 (B) reactions with A2 RBC and it would appear that A2 transferase enzymes do not have the capacity to transfer galactose to available H sites on A2 RBC, or alternatively do not produce sufficient B antigen to be detectable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%