2013
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0191)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further Evidence of Auditory Extinction in Aphasia

Abstract: Results indicate that, for IWA, auditory extinction may not be attributed to a binding deficit or inefficient attention resource allocation because of equivalent performance across all 5 conditions. Rather, overall attentional resources may be influential. Future research in aphasia should explore the effect of the stimulus presentation in addition to the continued study of attention treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That study reported slower and less accurate responses, at the group-level, to auditory stimuli in more complex tasks. In other previous investigations reporting difficulties in tests with auditory stimuli ( Erickson et al, 1996 ; LaCroix et al, 2021 ; Laures, 2005 ; Shisler Marshall et al, 2013 ), only responses to auditory stimuli were collected, hence no comparison between auditory and other sensory modalities can be made. Critically, poorer performance when reacting to auditory compared to visual stimuli might be attributable to differences in task difficulty or other task characteristics that are confounded with the modality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…That study reported slower and less accurate responses, at the group-level, to auditory stimuli in more complex tasks. In other previous investigations reporting difficulties in tests with auditory stimuli ( Erickson et al, 1996 ; LaCroix et al, 2021 ; Laures, 2005 ; Shisler Marshall et al, 2013 ), only responses to auditory stimuli were collected, hence no comparison between auditory and other sensory modalities can be made. Critically, poorer performance when reacting to auditory compared to visual stimuli might be attributable to differences in task difficulty or other task characteristics that are confounded with the modality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies have specifically investigated aspects of attention in individuals with aphasia (for a review see also Villard & Kiran, 2017 ). Most of this research focused on the processing of auditory stimuli and reported impairments in basic ( Laures, 2005 ; Shisler Marshall, Basilakos, & Love-Myers, 2013 ) or more complex auditory attention tests ( Kuptsova, Dragoy, & Ivanova, 2021 ; LaCroix, Baxter, & Rogalsky, 2020 ) as well as in situations where multiple stimuli must be attended at the same time ( Erickson, Goldinger, & LaPointe, 1996 ). Other recent studies used visual tasks ( LaCroix, Tully, & Rogalsky, 2021 ; Lee, Kocherginsky, & Cherney, 2020 ) and/or focused on the variabiltiy of reaction times ( Naranjo, Grande, & Alted, 2018 ; Villard & Kiran, 2015 , 2018 ), finding inter-individual differences and some associations with language performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The converse of this phenomenonright neglect in individuals with left-hemisphere damage and aphasia-is less common (Beis et al, 2004). However, despite this, a number of studies have noted some degree of decreased attention to stimuli presented on the right in PWA (Bouma & Ansink, 1988;Ihori, Kashiwagi, & Kashiwagi, 2015;Marshall, Basilakos, & Love-Myers, 2013;Petry, Crosson, Rothi, Bauer, & Schauer, 1994;Shisler, 2005).…”
Section: Motivation For Investigating Em and Im In Aphasiamentioning
confidence: 99%