2012
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further evidence that culture media affect perinatal outcome: findings after transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos

Abstract: Our findings support our hypothesis that culture medium influences perinatal outcome of IVF singletons and twins. A similar trend is seen in case of singletons born after FET. GA was not affected by culture medium. These results indicate that in vitro culture might be an important factor explaining the poorer perinatal outcome after assisted reproduction technology (ART). Further research is needed to confirm this culture medium-induced effect in humans and to provide more insight into whether it is caused by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
123
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
12
123
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, there is some evidence to suggest that the culture environment may affect embryo development, fetal growth, birthweight, and perinatal outcome [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56], although the majority of these studies have design shortcomings and/or are limited by sample size. Importantly, follow-up of children born following embryo culture in either single or sequential media was not reported in any of the studies included in the present meta-analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, there is some evidence to suggest that the culture environment may affect embryo development, fetal growth, birthweight, and perinatal outcome [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56], although the majority of these studies have design shortcomings and/or are limited by sample size. Importantly, follow-up of children born following embryo culture in either single or sequential media was not reported in any of the studies included in the present meta-analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences could be related with several aspects, among them the positive maternal effect due to the low number of litter size in VT litters compared to control litters and, probably, the embryo manipulation procedures. It is known that embryo manipulation occurring at preimplantation stages might alter future development because during this period, the embryo must undergo different events [38], affecting for instance the birth weight in human [18], or the appearance of "large offspring" phenotypes in cattle (for review see [25]), probably as a result of the impact of embryo manipulation on expression of some growthrelated imprinted genes. In fact, some re-searchers postulate that early exposure of mammals to stressful experiences could evoke some resilience to the effects of stressors [39] and, therefore, the early stress due to embryo manipulation could also act to adapt or prepare individuals for stressful environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade, research works have questioned whether embryo cryopreservation and transfer procedures are neutral to survivors [16][17][18], as preimplantation em-bryos are removed from their natural environment and subjected to manipulation (cryopreservation and transfer procedures) which in fact affect their RNA expression [19,20], placental transcriptome, and proteome [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Errors in imprinting in domestic animals have been linked to culture conditions as well (Lonergan et al, 2003). Adverse effects of in vitro culture may also affect human development, with evidence that shorter culture times yield better longterm outcomes (Kallen et al, 2010;Kalra et al, 2012) and that culture media composition can affect birthweights (Dumoulin et al, 2010;Nelissen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%