1971
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1971.01000010084016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further Experience With Sutureless Scleral Buckling Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the main differences between previous studies and the present one is the strength of the silicone‐scleral bond we produced with octyl 2‐cyanoacrylate. Ten minutes after attachment, this adhesive was already much stronger (220±35 g) than the isobutyl 2‐cyanoacrylate adhesive after 24 hours (154±51.9 g) (Calabria et al 1971). The second novelty in our technique is the silicone‐silicone suture we created.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the main differences between previous studies and the present one is the strength of the silicone‐scleral bond we produced with octyl 2‐cyanoacrylate. Ten minutes after attachment, this adhesive was already much stronger (220±35 g) than the isobutyl 2‐cyanoacrylate adhesive after 24 hours (154±51.9 g) (Calabria et al 1971). The second novelty in our technique is the silicone‐silicone suture we created.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of tissue adhesives as an alternative to sutures goes back to the mid‐1950s, when the methyl 2‐cyanoacrylate adhesive, Eastman 910, was first marketed for use in the field of medicine (Coover et al 1959). Subsequent studies (Calabria et al 1970, 1971; Spitznas et al 1973) introduced the use of isobutyl 2‐cyanoacrylate in scleral buckling surgery and in sutureless retinal reattachment as a new experimental method. The adhesive appeared to be well tolerated by ocular tissues, but in light of the short duration of the bond it produced and the migration of the encircling band observed in animals subjected to scleral buckling, both groups of investigators concluded that this glue was not suitable for use in the human eye.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%