1922
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1922.0043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further experimental investigations on the hypertrophy of the sexual glands

Abstract: In reference to my recent paper,* in consequence of criticism received privately from Mr. Ritchie, I re-investigated the use of the manganese dioxide electrode, and discovered a fault in my technique which invalidates the con clusions drawn.This fault was that the electrode was not shielded so as to prevent the muscle from touching a portion of the electrode with which it was not in equilibrium When the tension of the muscle increased there was a tendency for the muscle to straighten between the two points of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1923
1923
1973
1973

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of young per litter was nearly equal to the normal in the rabbit even when as much as one entire ovary and about two-thirds of the second ovary were removed (Asdell, 1924;Hammond, 1925). The remaining ovary, and the remaining ovarian fragment, undergo 'hypertrophy' (Carmichael & Marshall, 1908;Lipschutz, Wagner, Tamm & Bormann, 1922;Asdell, 1924;Slonaker, 1927). This ovarian 'hypertrophy' is due to the number of ripening follicles approaching the normal (Arai, 1920;Hartman, 1925;Lipschutz, 1925Lipschutz, , 1928Lipschutz & Voss, 1925b;Mandi, Zuckerman & Patterson, 1952).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of young per litter was nearly equal to the normal in the rabbit even when as much as one entire ovary and about two-thirds of the second ovary were removed (Asdell, 1924;Hammond, 1925). The remaining ovary, and the remaining ovarian fragment, undergo 'hypertrophy' (Carmichael & Marshall, 1908;Lipschutz, Wagner, Tamm & Bormann, 1922;Asdell, 1924;Slonaker, 1927). This ovarian 'hypertrophy' is due to the number of ripening follicles approaching the normal (Arai, 1920;Hartman, 1925;Lipschutz, 1925Lipschutz, , 1928Lipschutz & Voss, 1925b;Mandi, Zuckerman & Patterson, 1952).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%