2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further Insights Into the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS): Unidimensionality Among Psychiatric Inpatients

Abstract: Short versions of the Beck Hopelessness Scale have all been created according the Classical Test Theory, but the use and the application of this theory has been repeatedly criticized. In the current study, the Item Response Theory approach was employed to refine and shorten the BHS in order to build a reasonably coherent unidimensional scale whose items/symptoms can be treated as ordinal indicators of the theoretical concept of hopelessness, scaled along a single continuum. In a sample of 492 psychiatrically h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, and following a distinction made by Bonifay et al ( 45 ), our bifactor model is not intended to represent a structure of depression psychopathology, but solely for reflecting psychometric properties, i.e., to inform about the degree to which the BDI-II yields an univocal total score and the extent to which the subscales yield reliable scores after accounting for the general factor. Another way to address unidimensionality, and in order to avoid this type of methodological problems along with the difficult interpretability of the specific factors in bifactor models ( 6 ), may be in the application of models from item response theory (IRT) ( 48 , 49 ). Most of these studies, however, usually drop less-fitting items and result in shorter versions of the instrument.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, and following a distinction made by Bonifay et al ( 45 ), our bifactor model is not intended to represent a structure of depression psychopathology, but solely for reflecting psychometric properties, i.e., to inform about the degree to which the BDI-II yields an univocal total score and the extent to which the subscales yield reliable scores after accounting for the general factor. Another way to address unidimensionality, and in order to avoid this type of methodological problems along with the difficult interpretability of the specific factors in bifactor models ( 6 ), may be in the application of models from item response theory (IRT) ( 48 , 49 ). Most of these studies, however, usually drop less-fitting items and result in shorter versions of the instrument.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative attitudes about the future or hopelessness is conceived as the experience of anticipating unfavorable situations or consequences that are beyond a person’s control [ 33 ]. Hopelessness is recognized as a risk factor for self-harm and suicide [ 34 ]. In line with these results, 22% of patients in our study had depressive symptoms and 83% had moderate-to-severe hopelessness, implying a potential suicide risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beck et al, 1974 ; Bouvard et al, 1992 ; Steed, 2001 ; Kliem et al, 2018 ). In clinical populations, the BHS proved to discriminate between individuals with a high and moderate risk of suicide, as well as individuals with and without a history of suicide attempts (Granö et al, 2017 ; Balsamo et al, 2020 ). The internal consistency of the BHS for baseline scores in the current sample was good (α = 0.82).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%