Further methodological development of the Test Instrument for Profile of Physical Ability (TIPPA) designed for patients with long-term musculoskeletal pain

Missaghi-Wedefalk, Minaj; Lindh, Malin; Schön-Ohlsson, Christina; Willén, Carin

doi:10.3109/14038196.2012.694907

Cited by 4 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The SMET questionnaire multidisciplinary/multifactorial structure strengthens the validity through its three perspectives on the workplace: physically, environmentally, and psychosocially.Practical instruments, such as the Test Instrument for Profile of Physical Ability (TIPPA) [34] and PLIBEL (a method assigned for the identification of ergonomic hazards) (PLIBEL) [35] are often used in OHS, but these instruments do not have a multidisciplinary/multifactorial perspective. Evaluation regarding content validity in TIPPA and PLIBEL has been used as a complement during the planning of the SMET validation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Structured Multidisciplinary work Evaluation Tool: Development and validation of a multidisciplinary work questionnaire

Haraldsson

Jonker

Strengbom

et al. 2016

WOR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

METHOD:Communicative and pragmatic validity were tested through the development of the questionnaire using action theory and presented in a descriptive portrayal. The Content Validity Index (CVI) was used to test content validity for each item as well as for the questionnaire as a whole. CONCLUSION:The SMET questionnaire has very good content validity. The pervasive work with the SMET questionnaire also shows good pragmatic and communicative validity.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Content validity in TIPPA has been conducted with an expert panel approach similar to our validation of the SMET questionnaire [34]. Validation of PLIBEL was conducted through an extensive search in the scientific literature, which strengthens the content validity [28].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Structured Multidisciplinary work Evaluation Tool: Development and validation of a multidisciplinary work questionnaire

Haraldsson

Jonker

Strengbom

et al. 2016

WOR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Table 2 presents the extracted data for the assessment of the clinical criteria. Only three observation methods met all clinical criteria: 1) the Behavioral Avoidance Test-Back Pain (BAT-Back) [ 27 ], 2) the Pain Behavior Scale (PaBS) [ 36 ], and 3) the Test Instrument for Profile of Physical Ability (TIPPA) [ 37 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[ 11 , 18 , 27 – 30 , 34 , 35 , 37 , 39 , 42 , 44 – 47 , 49 – 51 , 53 – 59 , 61 – 63 , 67 , 68 , 70 – 74 , 88 , 97 , 103 – 105 , 107 , 109 , 111 – 114 ]…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

How to objectively assess and observe maladaptive pain behaviors in clinical rehabilitation: a systematic search and review

Naye

Cachinho²,

Tremblay

et al. 2021

Arch Physiother

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Cognitive-affective factors influence the perception of pain and disability. These factors can lead to pain behaviors (PB) that can persist and become maladaptive. These maladaptive PB will further increase the risk of chronicity or persistence of symptoms and disability. Thus, clinicians must be prepared to recognize maladaptive PB in a clinical context. To date, in the context of assessment in a rehabilitation setting, PB in clinical settings are poorly documented. The main objective of this study was to identify direct observation methods and critically appraise them in order to propose recommendations for practice. As a secondary objective, we explored and extracted the different observable PB that patients could exhibit and that clinicians could observe. Methods We conducted a comprehensive review on four databases with a generic search strategy in order to obtain the largest range of PB. For the first objective, a two-step critical appraisal used clinical criteria (from qualitative studies on barriers to implement routine measures) and psychometric criteria (from Brink and Louw critical appraisal tool) to determine which observation methods could be recommended for clinical practice. For the second objective, we extracted PB found in the literature to list potential PB that patients could exhibit, and clinicians could observe. Results From the 3362 retrieved studies, 47 met the inclusion criteria for the first objective. The clinical criteria allowed us to select three observation methods. After the psychometric step, two observation methods were retained and recommended for clinical practice: the Behavioral Avoidance Test-Back Pain (BAT-Back) and the Pain Behaviour Scale (PaBS). For the second objective, 107 studies met the inclusion criteria. The extraction of the PB allowed us to list a large range of PB and classify the data in 7 categories of PB. Conclusion Our results allowed us to recommend two observation methods for clinical practice. However, these methods have limitations and are validated only in chronic low back pain populations. With the extraction of PB presented in the literature, we contribute to better prepare clinicians to recognize PB in all patients who are experiencing pain.

show abstract

Mapping a measure of physical ability for persons with long-term musculoskeletal pain to the ICF and ICF Core Sets

Fresk

Brodin

Grooten

et al. 2018

European Journal of Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Further methodological development of the Test Instrument for Profile of Physical Ability (TIPPA) designed for patients with long-term musculoskeletal pain

Cited by 4 publications

References 25 publications

Structured Multidisciplinary work Evaluation Tool: Development and validation of a multidisciplinary work questionnaire

Structured Multidisciplinary work Evaluation Tool: Development and validation of a multidisciplinary work questionnaire

How to objectively assess and observe maladaptive pain behaviors in clinical rehabilitation: a systematic search and review

Mapping a measure of physical ability for persons with long-term musculoskeletal pain to the ICF and ICF Core Sets

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About