1983
DOI: 10.1016/s0174-3031(83)80066-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further observations of corynebacterium renale as an indicator organism in the detection of the exfoliation-positive strains of Staphylococcus aureus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The antimicrobial activity depends on the sensitivity of the indicator strains, and the activity was spanning between 100 AU/ml using the least sensitive indicator strain and 64,000 AU/ml when the most sensitive indicator strain was used (by the micro-titer assays). The inhibitory zones varied between 10 and 20 mm when the antimicrobial potency was tested on agar plates by Skalka [35]. The antimicrobial activity produced by the AL41 strain was lost after the treatment by proteases, which strongly suggested that the activity was due to the proteina- ceous substance, most probably a bacteriocin, and consequently that substance was puriWed and characterized.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The antimicrobial activity depends on the sensitivity of the indicator strains, and the activity was spanning between 100 AU/ml using the least sensitive indicator strain and 64,000 AU/ml when the most sensitive indicator strain was used (by the micro-titer assays). The inhibitory zones varied between 10 and 20 mm when the antimicrobial potency was tested on agar plates by Skalka [35]. The antimicrobial activity produced by the AL41 strain was lost after the treatment by proteases, which strongly suggested that the activity was due to the proteina- ceous substance, most probably a bacteriocin, and consequently that substance was puriWed and characterized.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bacteriocin activity was determined by three methods; by detection of clear zone around indicator organisms [35], by critical dilution method on micro titer plates [16] and by the agar spot test [10]. One bacteriocin unit was deWned as the amount of bacteriocin causing 50% growth inhibition (50% of the turbidity of the control culture without bacteriocin) or in AU/ml (arbitrary units per ml-the reciprocal of the highest twofold dilution demonstrating complete inhibitory activity of the indicator strain).…”
Section: Bacterial Cultures Media and Growth Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacteriocinogenic activity was assessed by a qualitative method according to Skalaka, Pillich, and Pospíšil (1983). E. avium EA5 (isolated from piglets by Strompfová & Lauková, 2007), L. monocytogenes CECT 934 and S. aureus ATCC 29213 were used as indicators for bacteriocinogenic potential assessment.…”
Section: Assessment Of Bacteriocinogenic Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection of inhibitory activity was performed using an agar diffusion method (Skalka et a / . 1983).…”
Section: E T E C T I O N O F I N H I B I T O R Y a C T I V I T Ymentioning
confidence: 99%