1994
DOI: 10.1016/0040-1951(94)90156-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further palaeomagnetic data from Chitral (Eastern Hindukush): evidence for an early India-Asia contact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to inclination only fold test they are postfolding magnetizations. The paleolatitudes calculated for the Case-II are well in agreement with the suit of secondary magnetizations, acquired at equatorial to low northern latitudes, at the time of India-Eurasia collision (Klootwijk et al, 1979;Klootwijk et al, 1984;Klootwijk et al, 1994;Zaman and Torii, 1999). The acquisition of these secondary magnetizations is attributed to the chemically active orogenic fluids at the time of collision (Zaman and Torii, 1999).…”
Section: Age Of Natural Remanent Magnetizationssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…According to inclination only fold test they are postfolding magnetizations. The paleolatitudes calculated for the Case-II are well in agreement with the suit of secondary magnetizations, acquired at equatorial to low northern latitudes, at the time of India-Eurasia collision (Klootwijk et al, 1979;Klootwijk et al, 1984;Klootwijk et al, 1994;Zaman and Torii, 1999). The acquisition of these secondary magnetizations is attributed to the chemically active orogenic fluids at the time of collision (Zaman and Torii, 1999).…”
Section: Age Of Natural Remanent Magnetizationssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Klootwijk et al (1992) suggest that contact was made by the K/T boundary at 65 Ma, a finding based on the greatly reduced rate of northern motion and associated with a causal link to Deccan Trap formation. Klootwijk et al (1994) provide evidence that the northwestern Deccan Plate had made contact with Eurasia at or before the K/T boundary. Rowley (1996) dated an initial contact with Asia in the Lower Eocene Ma) for the northwestern Deccan Plate and a Middle Eocene contact Ma) in the northeast.…”
Section: Deccan Plate Tectonic Eventsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The Basin deformed somewhat and filled with deposits of the Lulehe Fm. The initiation of deformation and deposition in the western Qaidam Basin during this period not only indicates the initial activity and Cenozoic uplift of the Kunlun and Altyn Tagh Mts., but more importantly, could have been a direct response to the initial collision between the Indian and Eurasian plates during this time (Zeitler, 1991;Zeitler et al, 1993;Klootwijk et al, 1992Klootwijk et al, , 1994Lee and Lawver, 1995;Searle, 1996;Patzelt et al, 1996;Mattauer et al, 1999;Yin and Harrison, 2000;Aitchison, 2006, 2008;Aitchison et al, 2007;Wu et al, 2008;Yin et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2010a,b;Xia et al, 2011). This timing coincides with many other geological events: (1) the initiation of crustal shortening and increase in sedimentary deposition in the western Qaidam Basin (Zhang, 2006;Zhou et al, 2006;Wang et al, 2010a,b); (2) initiation of thrusting in the northern and southern margins of the Qaidam Basin (Yin et al, 2002); (3) increased volcanic activity on the Tibetan Plateau after 51 Ma (Chung et al, 1998(Chung et al, , 2005(Chung et al, , 2009Lai, 2000;Deng et al, 2000;Wang et al, 2001Wang et al, , 2010aMo et al, 2003;Liu et al, 2004;Li et al, 2005;Qu et al, 2009;Xia et al, 2010), and (4) formation of a series of Cenozoic basins within and near the edge of the Tibet Plateau Liu and Wang, 2001;Zhao et al, 2000;Yue et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%