2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40435-022-00924-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further results on delay-dependent state feedback $$H_\infty $$ control of linear parameter varying time-delay systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let the step-size h = 0.01 and choose T = 50, Algorithm 2 yields stabilizing initial values of ⃗ K as The results indicate that, for this example, the LMI approaches 10,12 are unable to seek the stabilizing gain matrices while the proposed method can provide a feasible solution. One reason for this difference is that the sufficient and necessary stability condition (7) for the delay system is used in the proposed method.…”
Section: F I G U R E 4 Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Let the step-size h = 0.01 and choose T = 50, Algorithm 2 yields stabilizing initial values of ⃗ K as The results indicate that, for this example, the LMI approaches 10,12 are unable to seek the stabilizing gain matrices while the proposed method can provide a feasible solution. One reason for this difference is that the sufficient and necessary stability condition (7) for the delay system is used in the proposed method.…”
Section: F I G U R E 4 Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following examples, we compare the proposed method with other methods mentioned in the literature. We first use Example 3 to demonstrate the comparison with the LMI‐based $$ {\mathscr{H}}_{\infty } $$ control method in References 10 and 12. Then we use Example 4 to demonstrate the comparison with the optimization‐based 2$$ {\mathscr{H}}_2 $$ control method in Reference 18.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations