2019
DOI: 10.1080/00207179.2019.1616824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further results on the distance and area control of planar formations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expression 9 z 23 " 0 2 can be transformed to the following set of angle constraints, namely 10), we obtain pg 12 , g 13 q " pg ‹ 12 , g ‹ 13 q corresponding to the equilibrium configurations in S p while the solution in (11) (8). By an immediate substitution, we obtain for the dynamics of the bearing robot R2, 9 p 2 " K b b ‹ sum ": w. Remark 1: The signed area for a triangle can be obtained using the expression [15], [16]. The signed area of the desired formation shape evaluates to…”
Section: B Moving Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expression 9 z 23 " 0 2 can be transformed to the following set of angle constraints, namely 10), we obtain pg 12 , g 13 q " pg ‹ 12 , g ‹ 13 q corresponding to the equilibrium configurations in S p while the solution in (11) (8). By an immediate substitution, we obtain for the dynamics of the bearing robot R2, 9 p 2 " K b b ‹ sum ": w. Remark 1: The signed area for a triangle can be obtained using the expression [15], [16]. The signed area of the desired formation shape evaluates to…”
Section: B Moving Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, it is easy to see η ij = 0 if and only if e ij = 0. Therefore, instead of using e ij directly, we will use the squared distance error (24) to impose specific prescribed performance bounds for all times. Similar to the results developed in [36][37][38]53], for each edge of the rigid framework, first a smooth decreasing performance function…”
Section: Prescribed Performance Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method for dealing with the problem of convergence to incorrect equilibrium points (undesired shapes) of distance-based formation acquisition controllers was recently proposed in [23], introducing an additional control variable (the signed area of a triangle) for triangular shapes. Later, Liu et al [24] tried to generalize this method for planar formations with n > 3 agents. Furthermore, the authors in [25] have analyzed the effects of distance mismatches between neighboring agents in distance-based formation stabilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To effectively track the leader, follower agents require sufficiently accurate estimates of the leader's pose in the inertial frame, which can be affected by noisy sensor measurements, exogenous disturbances from the environment, such as wind or downwash from nearby agents -in the case where the agents are aerial vehicles -or even uncertainty in the communication network from delays and packet drops. Thus, it is often the case that the multiagent system (MAS) will fail to track the reference trajectory while keeping formation, or deviate from the desired formation altogether, causing unintended and even unsafe effects [6]. Furthermore, the disturbances themselves may be difficult, computationally expensive, or impossible to estimate, making formation tracking under uncertainty both a safety-critical requirement and a nontrivial problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%