2001
DOI: 10.1007/s004200000194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further round-robin tests to improve the comparability between laboratories of the measurement of carbon in diesel soot and in environmental samples

Abstract: It was expected that a significant improvement would be seen in the inter-laboratory dispersion by the use of a common standardized thermal desorption program, but the objectives of these RRTs were only partly reached. This paper provides new information that will be useful in the elaboration of a standardized procedure for the European Normalisation Centre (CEN TC 137 WG2--General requirements for measuring procedures).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…cyclones or elutriators) seems to have no significant influence on the results or is not measurable under these conditions. The analytical procedures used by the different laboratories have been evaluated in former round robins [6]. The results from this inter-comparison support the findings of those carried out previously.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…cyclones or elutriators) seems to have no significant influence on the results or is not measurable under these conditions. The analytical procedures used by the different laboratories have been evaluated in former round robins [6]. The results from this inter-comparison support the findings of those carried out previously.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This is based on the experience of the different laboratories represented in the working group [2]. To gain more information on the performance of the methods used and their comparability, several roundrobin tests have been organised on different types of samples [6]. More than 15 laboratories have participated in one or more of these inter-comparison tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More information on the intercomparison of these methods has been reported Hering et al, 1990;Guillemin et al, 1997Guillemin et al, , 2001Birch, 1998). As previously stated, it is not the objective of this review to summarize the differences in the EC measurements but rather to highlight the fact that these measurements are different and that biases and errors can result in source attribution studies if the results from different measurement techniques are integrated or if conclusions based on one set of measurements are extrapolated to a data set that utilizes a different measurement technique.…”
Section: Measurements Of Ecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researches have conducted comparisons between thermal methods [44][45][46][47][48] . The results for TC are usually coincident in contrast to the variations in the proportions of EC and OC in different methods.…”
Section: Monitoring Of Elemental Carbon (Ec)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results for TC are usually coincident in contrast to the variations in the proportions of EC and OC in different methods. Without optical correction, the differences were mainly caused by the different temperature profiles of protocols used by each procedure 44) . Some OC are charred at high temperatures without oxygen and make EC larger, a positive bias, if optical correction is not applied 45) .…”
Section: Monitoring Of Elemental Carbon (Ec)mentioning
confidence: 99%