1986
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further specification of the five robust factors of personality.

Abstract: Studies of personality trait organization as observed in ratings have frequently suggested that a fivefactor model will not only suffice to account for observed correlations but will also stand the test of replicability. Factor analysis of 43 scales used to rate 499 children supported the five-factor model, although, as in some other studies, a weak sixth factor was evident. Intellect very clearly emerged as one of the five factors. The factors appear to be constructs that have been in the personality literatu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
333
0
10

Year Published

1987
1987
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 522 publications
(361 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
14
333
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, there is something persistent in children's personality that can be judged by well informed observers, who generally agree with each other (Caspi, 2000). If the number of rating scales is wide enough, the domain of descriptors used by knowledgeable others (teachers or parents, for instance) to characterize adolescent personality is very often and almost exhaustively accounted for by five robust factors (Digman & Inouye, 1986;Goldberg, 2001). These results, and a quantity of other data, accompanied by our own observations, make it very unlikely that children younger than 12 years of age and scoring, say, less than 38 points on the SPM do not already have a personality structure or that it is very dissimilar to the adult structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, there is something persistent in children's personality that can be judged by well informed observers, who generally agree with each other (Caspi, 2000). If the number of rating scales is wide enough, the domain of descriptors used by knowledgeable others (teachers or parents, for instance) to characterize adolescent personality is very often and almost exhaustively accounted for by five robust factors (Digman & Inouye, 1986;Goldberg, 2001). These results, and a quantity of other data, accompanied by our own observations, make it very unlikely that children younger than 12 years of age and scoring, say, less than 38 points on the SPM do not already have a personality structure or that it is very dissimilar to the adult structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on principles 5 and 6, we also predicted that rank-order stability would not differ substantially by gender or among the Big Five traits. Finally, given that previous studies had demonstrated that the childhood data conformed to the Big-Five trait structure (Digman & Inouye, 1986;Goldberg 2001), we predicted that we would demonstrate construct continuity between the child and adult versions of these latent traits. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Was der "Persön-lichkeit selbst" zugrunde liegt, könne davon verschieden sein. (Mulaik, 1964, Peabody, 1984, Digman & Inouye, 1986 (Wittgenstein, 1989, p. 17).…”
Section: Gewissenhaftigkeitunclassified