2002
DOI: 10.1080/713713492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further Studies of a Model for the Etiology of Anomalies of Tooth Number and Size in Humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease in size was directly proportional to the degree of severity of hypodontia with the mean size values decreasing progressively from the control subjects through mild, moderate and then severe hypodontia. This is consistent with the results of previous studies that have employed traditional measurement techniques (Garn and Lewis, 1970; Baum and Cohen, 1971; Rune and Sarnas, 1974; Brook, 1984; Ooshima et al, 1996; Schalk-van der Weide and Bosman, 1996; Brook et al, 2002, 2009a; McKeown et al, 2002). Other researchers have reported that the degree of size reduction was associated with the degree of the severity of the hypodontia (Rantanen, 1956; Alvesalo and Portin, 1969; Garn and Lewis, 1970; Lavelle, 1970; Rune and Sarnas, 1974; Brook, 1984; Brook et al, 2009b; Yaqoob et al, 2011; Mirabella et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The decrease in size was directly proportional to the degree of severity of hypodontia with the mean size values decreasing progressively from the control subjects through mild, moderate and then severe hypodontia. This is consistent with the results of previous studies that have employed traditional measurement techniques (Garn and Lewis, 1970; Baum and Cohen, 1971; Rune and Sarnas, 1974; Brook, 1984; Ooshima et al, 1996; Schalk-van der Weide and Bosman, 1996; Brook et al, 2002, 2009a; McKeown et al, 2002). Other researchers have reported that the degree of size reduction was associated with the degree of the severity of the hypodontia (Rantanen, 1956; Alvesalo and Portin, 1969; Garn and Lewis, 1970; Lavelle, 1970; Rune and Sarnas, 1974; Brook, 1984; Brook et al, 2009b; Yaqoob et al, 2011; Mirabella et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Twin studies suggest that tooth size is predominantly under genetic control . Other family‐based studies suggest that relatives of individuals with hypodontia have an increased tendency for missing and smaller teeth in general and there is evidence that palatally impacted canines have genetic component…”
Section: The Aetiology Of Malocclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations at molecular and cellular levels have identified the fundamental mechanisms which were predicted from the model based on statistical analysis of clinical epidemiological data [9,74,75]. When considered in conjunction with clinically based investigations [76][77][78][79], it becomes clear that many dental phenotypes are inter-related and that they are influenced by a combination of genetic, environmental and epigenetic factors. Indeed, common dental anomalies such as missing or extra teeth can be viewed as representing the extremes of a continuous spectrum of co-variation for which there are likely to be common underlying developmental mechanisms.…”
Section: Locating and Identifying Genes Affecting Dental Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%