1961
DOI: 10.1016/s0082-0784(06)80594-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further studies of combustion phenomena in a spherical combustor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the experimental conditions of the spherical combustors are atmospheric and/or subatmospheric [14,15,16,17,18,19,20] loading parameter is based on the assumtion that the system is adiabatic and controlled by purely chemical reaction rate. As the pressure increases, it may give an increased deviation from the previous assumptions, probably due to the dynamic flow effect as indeed, some investigators have suggested [15,16] and also to heat removal effects due to the high density flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the experimental conditions of the spherical combustors are atmospheric and/or subatmospheric [14,15,16,17,18,19,20] loading parameter is based on the assumtion that the system is adiabatic and controlled by purely chemical reaction rate. As the pressure increases, it may give an increased deviation from the previous assumptions, probably due to the dynamic flow effect as indeed, some investigators have suggested [15,16] and also to heat removal effects due to the high density flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(10) can be written, (11) Thus, A does not have to be described explicitly. A typical value for E is 26,613 gm.cal./gm.mole, for near-stoichiometric mixtures (Clarke et al, 1960).…”
Section: Simulation Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various global Arrhenius rate expressions have been published in the literature to represent propane/air combustion at different conditions, e.g., Greenhough and Lefebvre (1956), Clarke et al (1960) and Herbert (1960). One that is more appropriate for low equivalence ratios (around 0.5) is given by, _ Am° 5mo.5PT-0.5 exp(-56,600/%T) This has the form of Eq.…”
Section: Need For Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anon [4] explored skew and dispersion of a spray cone (sometimes caused by internal flow leakage of the nozzle). In their stirring reactor or burner, Longwell and Weiss [5][6][7] studied the relying relationship of combustion reaction rate with pressures. Burgoyne, Cohen et al [8][9][10][11][12] observed the flame propagation through non-uniform fuel-air mixture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%