1969
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.53.1.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further Studies on the Roles of Sodium and Potassium in the Generation of the Electro-Olfactogram

Abstract: A B S T R A C TIn the negative EOG-generating process a cation which can substitute for Na + was sought among the monovalent ions, Li +, Rb +, Cs +, NH4 +, and TEA +, the divalent ions, Mg ++, Ca ++, Sr ++, Ba ++, Zn++, Cd++, Mn ++, Co ++, and Ni ++, and the trivalent ions, A1 +++ and Fe II z. In Ringer solutions in which Na + was replaced by one of these cations the negative EOG's decreased in amplitude and could not maintain the original amplitudes. In K+-Ringer solution in which Na + was replaced by K +, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding is in agreement with the report of Takagi et al (1969), that for the generation of the normal, negative EOG, mucosal and serosal Na ÷ ions were necessary and could not be substituted by any of the mono-, di-, or trivalent cations that they used. Of course, the odorant-induced compound EOG, based on receptor currents of many ORCs (Ottoson, 1956(Ottoson, , 1971, may contain non-Na + components in addition.…”
Section: Mucosal Na ÷ As Charge Carrier Of the Cyclic Nucleotide Depesupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our finding is in agreement with the report of Takagi et al (1969), that for the generation of the normal, negative EOG, mucosal and serosal Na ÷ ions were necessary and could not be substituted by any of the mono-, di-, or trivalent cations that they used. Of course, the odorant-induced compound EOG, based on receptor currents of many ORCs (Ottoson, 1956(Ottoson, , 1971, may contain non-Na + components in addition.…”
Section: Mucosal Na ÷ As Charge Carrier Of the Cyclic Nucleotide Depesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…EOGs represent compound signals from in situ receptor cells and from glia-like sustentacular cells of the olfactory mucosa. The EOG response to mucosal cation substitution suggested that the charge carriers of odor-induced currents are either Na + (Takagi et al, 1969) or Ca 2+ (Suzuki, 1978;Winegar et al, 1988). Alternatively, based on EOGs it was claimed that cations do not give rise to receptor currents (Yoshii and Kurihara, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cysteine was the only amino acid that generated a positive EOG response in oil exposed stingrays and a normal negative EOG response in stingrays that were exposed to untreated seawater conditions. This phenomenon has not been documented previously in either teleosts or elasmobranchs but it has been documented in frogs 50 , newts 51 , and tortoises 52 . One example that has caused a positive EOG is when barium ions and a degenerated epithelium caused the blocking of chloride ions from entering the cell but not potassium ions from exiting the cell 50 , 52 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The nasal mucosa responds to odorants with an inwardly directed short-circuit current which depends on the presence of Na ions in the mucosal solution [65]. Recently it was shown that part of the "chemosensory" inward current is blocked by amiloride, an inhibitor of several Na-transport systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%