2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2003.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further validation of DEM modeling of milling: effects of liner profile and mill speed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
14
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In this simulation we use the experimental data as given by Moyes et al [22]. To gauge the differences that exist between DEM and experiment we keep the spring parameters the same as we vary both the mill-speed and load.…”
Section: Charge Motion and Power Draw For A Slice Millmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this simulation we use the experimental data as given by Moyes et al [22]. To gauge the differences that exist between DEM and experiment we keep the spring parameters the same as we vary both the mill-speed and load.…”
Section: Charge Motion and Power Draw For A Slice Millmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fig 8a, maximum number of new particles is formed for Fast-Flo lactose which is the least cohesive material. We can further corroborate the behavior of fragmentation of cohesive particles by computing the energy of fragmentation using eq (5), where m* is the geometric mass of the colliding particles and v j is the relative velocity of the colliding particles. Figure 8b depicts that a greater energy of fragmentation is required for more cohesive material, regular lactose, as compared with same used for fragmenting Avicel 101.…”
Section: Effect Of Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Este valor está condizente com valores observados em literatura. Rajamani e Venugopal (2001) assumiram como 0,6 o valor do coeficiente de restituição de esferas de aço de diâmetro 50,80 mm e densidade 8000 kg/m³, enquanto que Hlungwani et al (2003), adotaram o valor ess = 0,66 para esferas de aço-cromo de diâmetro 22,24 mm e densidade 7800 kg/m³.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…O software FLUENT® apresenta este parâmetro como default (padrão) igual a 0,9 e em estudos de simulação DEM ainda foram utilizados valores de 0,6 e 0,66 para esferas de aço-cromo por Rajamani e Venugopal (2001) e Hlungwani et al (2003) respectivamente. Normalmente, a medida experimental do coeficiente de restituição não é realizada e, em estudos de simulação, valores deste coeficiente encontrados na literatura são adotados ou mesmo arbitrariamente assumidos.…”
Section: Abordagem Eulerianaunclassified