Furthering systems theory towards social theory by revisiting critical systems thinking: connecting problem-solving and theory-building

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose is to forward systems theory one more step towards social theory and integrate problem-solving and theory-building, and search for the integration and unity of science by revealing the nature and role of critical systems thinking (CST).Design/methodology/approachThis article describes relations between systems theory and social theory in three parts. First, it examines the links of systems methodologies with three social science approaches as well as the role of CST. Second, the focus of theory and the form of explanation are discussed from critical social science (CSS) perspective. Third, the direction of theorizing of a CST-based systems theory is investigated.FindingsFirst, CST is a hidden assumption of system dynamics (SD)/systems thinking (ST). Second, systems theory is positioned in CSS. Third, CST integrates traditional and soft systems methodologies (SSM), and connects systems science and social science. Fourth, this article reveals hidden links between systems approaches and three corresponding social science approaches. Fifth, the theoretical focus of a CST-based systems theory could be formal/structure theory and/or substantive/content theory. Sixth, the form of explanation could be structural/mechanismic explanation combining causal and interpretive explanations. Seventh, a CST-based systems theory may adopt abduction, which complements a defect in deduction and induction in a difficulty of nonlinearity.Originality/valueIt illustrates a graph of the competing approaches in systems science corresponding to paradigms in social science.

Identification of critical paths leading to cost claims for underground metro projects: a system dynamics approach

“…There are generally two distinctions in systems practice: soft and hard systems thinking. While “hard” systems thinking is often used to understand a relatively well-defined technical problem, “soft” systems thinking is more suitable for solving complex management problems, and they give high importance to the presence of “human” attributes in the system hierarchy (Checkland, 2000; Lo and Liu, 2021). In dealing with real-world managerial issues, soft systems methodology can be instigated to develop conceptual models to evaluate the underlying dynamics of the system-problem structuring (Reisman and Oral, 2005).…”

“…In dealing with real-world managerial issues, soft systems methodology can be instigated to develop conceptual models to evaluate the underlying dynamics of the system-problem structuring (Reisman and Oral, 2005). That is to say, they help correctly understand an underlying cause of the problem; and adopt a consistent, satisfactory and feasible solution instead of an optimal solution (Lo and Liu, 2021). This study, therefore, used the soft systems approach using cognitive mapping to provide an explicit mental model that promotes mutual understanding of the problem among team members.…”

Theoretical Framework and Research Proposal for Energy Utilization, Conservation, Production, and Intelligent Systems in Tropical Island Zero-Carbon Building

“…He defined a system as "a complex composed of several interacting elements", thus defining the three basic characteristics of purposefulness, dynamics, and orderliness of systems theory and emphasizing the importance of system thinking [34]. Bertalanffy's work inspired other scholars, including Bertalanffy's work inspired other scholars, including Talcott Parsons and Niklas Luhmann, who applied systems theory to the study of social systems [35]. In the mid-20 th century, ecologists Howard T. Odum and Eugene P. Odum introduced system theory into the field of ecology, pioneering research in ecosystem ecology, energy ecology, etc., and proposing the ecosystem theory [36].…”