2021
DOI: 10.1080/00207454.2021.1941947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fused CNN-LSTM deep learning emotion recognition model using electroencephalography signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Table 6 and Figure 5 shown, the training parameters of CNN-RNN without the channel-temporal attention mechanism (264,707/532,211) were much smaller than those of RNN (544,243/1108,963), while the average accuracy was substantially higher than that of RNN (19.34% and 21.29% improvement). This, as has been shown in previous studies ( Sheykhivand et al, 2020 ; Zhang et al, 2020 ; Ramzan and Dawn, 2021 ), demonstrates that it is necessary to consider both spatial and temporal information of EEG signals for emotion recognition. And the CA-CNN-RNN models achieved an average accuracy of 78.11% (1.56% lower than CNN-LSTM model and 10% improvement on negative emotion) and 91.11% (3.37% improvement over CNN-Bi-LSTM model), respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As Table 6 and Figure 5 shown, the training parameters of CNN-RNN without the channel-temporal attention mechanism (264,707/532,211) were much smaller than those of RNN (544,243/1108,963), while the average accuracy was substantially higher than that of RNN (19.34% and 21.29% improvement). This, as has been shown in previous studies ( Sheykhivand et al, 2020 ; Zhang et al, 2020 ; Ramzan and Dawn, 2021 ), demonstrates that it is necessary to consider both spatial and temporal information of EEG signals for emotion recognition. And the CA-CNN-RNN models achieved an average accuracy of 78.11% (1.56% lower than CNN-LSTM model and 10% improvement on negative emotion) and 91.11% (3.37% improvement over CNN-Bi-LSTM model), respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This culminated in an average accuracy of 94.13%. Ramzan et al [29] combined CNN and LSTM-RNN; two deep learning models appeared to work better when analyzing EEG signals for emotions. The fused deep learning classification model's analysis of the SEED dataset's average accuracy in detecting both positive and negative emotions yielded a result of 93.74%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization entails the pursuit of an optimal parameter configuration that empowers the model to yield precise predictions on training data and extend its effectiveness to new, unobserved data. In our research, the Adam optimizer will be used because of it is efficiency compared to other optimizers [18,28,29].…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the development of technology, deep learning techniques were also heavily applied to EEG signal emotion recognition [ [19] , [20] , [21] ]. Zhong P et al [ 22 ] proposed a method based on regularized graph neural networks (RGNN) for emotion recognition of EEG, which accuracy was 94.24 % on the SEED dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%