1985
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusimotor after‐effects on responses of primary endings to test dynamic stimuli in cat muscle spindles.

Abstract: SUMMARY1. Conditioning stimulation of individual dynamic fusimotor axons, either y or , leaves after-effects which enhance the responses ofprimary endings to test stimulation of the same axon applied during slow ramp stretch. These after-effects have a long duration, persisting well over 5 min, but are abolished by stretch of large amplitude.2. The dynamic after-effects also enhance frequencygrams elicited by lowfrequency repetitive stimulation during slow ramp stretch, causing single stimuli to become much mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such after-effects are abolished by a large stretch of the muscle. As shown in the preceding paper (Emonet-Denand, Hunt & Laporte, 1985), the after-effect of dynamic fusimotor stimulation enhances the response of primary endings to test stimulation of dynamic axons during slow ramp stretch. This effect, reflecting residual changes in the bag1 fibre, is also destroyed by a large muscle stretch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such after-effects are abolished by a large stretch of the muscle. As shown in the preceding paper (Emonet-Denand, Hunt & Laporte, 1985), the after-effect of dynamic fusimotor stimulation enhances the response of primary endings to test stimulation of dynamic axons during slow ramp stretch. This effect, reflecting residual changes in the bag1 fibre, is also destroyed by a large muscle stretch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Preliminary reports of a portion of this work have appeared (Emonet-Denand & Hunt, 1984; Emonet-Denand, Hunt & Laporte, 1983). METHODS The methods were the same as reported in the previous paper (Emonet-DIenand et al 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, more subtle fusimotor related enhancement of muscle spindle afferent sensitivity, which is more likely to facilitate the detection of weak stimuli, are known as fusimotor after-effects [40][42]. The advantage of this mechanism is that it can increase sensitivity of muscle spindle endings in the absence of noise inducing fusimotor contraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fusimotor activation is the key factor regulating the sensitivity and dynamic range of muscle spindle operation [39] , however, for detection of very weak stimuli this mechanism may not be always efficient because weak activation and twitches of intrafusal muscle fibres below their fusion frequency generate twitch induced spiking activity that may mask the effects of very weak stimuli. However, more subtle fusimotor related enhancement of muscle spindle afferent sensitivity, which is more likely to facilitate the detection of weak stimuli, are known as fusimotor after-effects [40] [42] . The advantage of this mechanism is that it can increase sensitivity of muscle spindle endings in the absence of noise inducing fusimotor contraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They combine information on both position and velocity in signals which, in addition, depend on the efferent activities of ~, /3 or 7 fibers (Crowe and Matthews 1964;Hulliger 1984;Emonet-Denand et al 1985;Ribot et al 1986). These two complementary aspects (coding and decoding) are closely linked and need to be approached in a combined study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%