2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-022-1034-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusing Minimal Unit Probability Integration Method and Optimized Quantum Annealing for Spatial Location of Coal Goafs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zha and Li demonstrated these advantages of the GA by comparing with the performance of the least square and pattern search method in parameters inversion in the probability integral method under complex conditions [20,21]. These advantages were also verified with other intelligent methods, including PSO [22], SAA [23], quantum annealing [24][25][26], and the fireworks algorithm [27], The invasive weed optimization [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Zha and Li demonstrated these advantages of the GA by comparing with the performance of the least square and pattern search method in parameters inversion in the probability integral method under complex conditions [20,21]. These advantages were also verified with other intelligent methods, including PSO [22], SAA [23], quantum annealing [24][25][26], and the fireworks algorithm [27], The invasive weed optimization [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Subsequently, based on this working zone, the magnetotelluric sounding method was adopted to verify the delineated goafs by TEM, and the anomalous apparent resistivity surface obtained by these two methods was basically constant. In view of the problems of existing methods for solving the parameters of goaf spatial features, (Wei et al, 2022) proposed a method of identifying the spatial location of underground coal goafs by using the minimum unit probability integration merging method and optimized quantum annealing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Zha et al [12] successfully applied a genetic algorithm to the probability integral method for parameter inversion, demonstrating notable advantages in terms of accuracy and reliability. Subsequent investigations explored the use of the modular vector method [13][14][15], particle swarm algorithms [16][17][18][19], simulated annealing algorithms [20,21], and others [22][23][24][25][26][27] for parameter inversion within the probability integral method framework, all yielding highly satisfactory results. In a comparative analysis of parameter inversion outcomes using various intelligent algorithms, Han Mei et al [28] confirmed that, with an appropriate choice of initial exploration values, the modular vector method excels in accuracy and reliability when contrasted with other algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%