2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusing the RGBD SLAM with Wheel Odometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we make a comparison with the positioning method of the RGB-D camera and wheel odometry based on sparse feature points. The method in [13] fuse the RGB-D camera and wheel odometry based on the filter method and use their robots to acquire the results. The average error of our positioning results was 0.0297 m, which is better than the RMSE of 0.153 m in [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, we make a comparison with the positioning method of the RGB-D camera and wheel odometry based on sparse feature points. The method in [13] fuse the RGB-D camera and wheel odometry based on the filter method and use their robots to acquire the results. The average error of our positioning results was 0.0297 m, which is better than the RMSE of 0.153 m in [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method in [13] fuse the RGB-D camera and wheel odometry based on the filter method and use their robots to acquire the results. The average error of our positioning results was 0.0297 m, which is better than the RMSE of 0.153 m in [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation