Liposomes are attractive vehicles
for localized delivery of antibiotics.
There exists, however, a gap in knowledge when it comes to achieving
high liposomal loading efficiencies for antibiotics. To address this
issue, we investigated three antibiotics of clinical relevance against
staphylococcal infections with different hydrophilicity and chemical
structure, namely, vancomycin hydrochloride, teicoplanin, and rifampin.
We categorized the suitability of different encapsulation techniques
on the basis of encapsulation efficiency, lipid requirement (important
for avoiding lipid toxicity), and mass yield (percentage of mass retained
during the preparation process). The moderately hydrophobic (teicoplanin)
and highly hydrophobic (rifampin) antibiotics varied significantly
in their encapsulation load (max 23.4 and 15.5%, respectively) and
mass yield (max 74.1 and 71.8%, respectively), favoring techniques
that maximized partition between the aqueous core and the lipid bilayer
or those that produce oligolamellar vesicles, whereas vancomycin hydrochloride,
a highly hydrophilic molecule, showed little preference to any of
the protocols. In addition, we report significant bias introduced
by the choice of analytical method adopted to quantify the encapsulation
efficiency (underestimation of up to 24% or overestimation by up to
57.9% for vancomycin and underestimation of up to 61.1% for rifampin)
and further propose ultrafiltration and bursting by methanol as the
method with minimal bias for quantification of encapsulation efficiency
in liposomes. The knowledge generated in this work provides critical
insight into the more practical, albeit less investigated, aspects
of designing vesicles for localized antibiotic delivery and can be
extended to other nanovehicles that may suffer from the same biases
in analytical protocols.