2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.08.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusion cross sections for fusion energy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present work, based on precise CWFs, we calibrate optical potential parameters V r , V i , and r 0 for D+D, D+T, D+ 3 He, p+D, p+ 6 Li and p+ 7 Li fusion reactions. We find that our calculated optical potential parameters are quite different from those of many previous results [10][11][12][13][14], in which ACWFs with only retaining the leading terms are exploited for the continuity conditions at the radius of nuclear potential well. The phase diagrams of FCSs with respect to the optical potential parameters demonstrate several separate narrow shape resonance belts, indicating that a small deviation from the exact CWFs might lead to fall off the resonance regimes and therefore cause the big difference on the optical parameters.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present work, based on precise CWFs, we calibrate optical potential parameters V r , V i , and r 0 for D+D, D+T, D+ 3 He, p+D, p+ 6 Li and p+ 7 Li fusion reactions. We find that our calculated optical potential parameters are quite different from those of many previous results [10][11][12][13][14], in which ACWFs with only retaining the leading terms are exploited for the continuity conditions at the radius of nuclear potential well. The phase diagrams of FCSs with respect to the optical potential parameters demonstrate several separate narrow shape resonance belts, indicating that a small deviation from the exact CWFs might lead to fall off the resonance regimes and therefore cause the big difference on the optical parameters.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…We calibrate optical potential parameters for D+D, D+T, D+ 3 He, p+D, p+ 6 Li and p+ 7 Li fusion reactions by benchmarking with experimental cross section data. We find that our calculated optical potential parameters are quite different from those of many previous results with ACWFs [10][11][12][13][14]. For the optical model parameters of p+ 6 Li, p+D and D+D fusion reactions, the relative errors of the real part, imaginary part and the nuclear radius of the optical potentials can reach 148%, -621% and -159%, respectively.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Gamow-Sommerfield factor G(E) is a penetration factor of the Coulomb barrier by the incident particle that characterizes the likelihood of incident/target nuclei undergoing fusion. It is represented by an exponential attenuation function [34] expressed as…”
Section: B Gamow-sommerfield Factor G(e)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The β-heating becomes an essential factor in forming a uniform and thick DT shell in a cryogenic capsule [7][8][9][10][11]. There is no doubt that DT fuel has the most promise for ignition because of larger reaction cross-section than other hydrogen combinations [12][13][14]. But the resulted radiological impacts such as tritium contamination, neutron activation and neutron-induced radiation effects in diagnostics have to be resolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%