2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2011.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusion of 6Li with 152Sm: Role of projectile breakup versus target deformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shortcoming can be avoided within a new dynamical quantum approach that includes SCF as well as ICF from the bound state(s) of the projectile [26]. In addition, the comparison of experimental fusion cross sections with either the predictions of coupled-channel (CC) calculations without the breakup and transfer channels [12][13][14][15][16][27][28][29][30][31] or the predictions of a single barrier penetration model (SBPM) [9][10][11] shows that CF cross sections are suppressed owing to the breakup at energies above the Coulomb barrier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shortcoming can be avoided within a new dynamical quantum approach that includes SCF as well as ICF from the bound state(s) of the projectile [26]. In addition, the comparison of experimental fusion cross sections with either the predictions of coupled-channel (CC) calculations without the breakup and transfer channels [12][13][14][15][16][27][28][29][30][31] or the predictions of a single barrier penetration model (SBPM) [9][10][11] shows that CF cross sections are suppressed owing to the breakup at energies above the Coulomb barrier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…σ theo is determined by running CCFULL code [3,10]. Knowing the experimental value of fusion cross section (σ exp ) [4,5], the empirical fusion suppression factor is determined from Eq. (10) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These nuclei have unusually low separation energy among its constituents and therefore have a high breakup probability. The nucleus 6 Li breaks up into 4 He + 2 H with separation energy, S α = 1.48 MeV. As a result these nuclei promptly break up during the fusion process of these projectiles with a heavy target nucleus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, there is a lot of data available for complete fusion (CF) cross-sections with 6,7 Li and 9 Be projectiles on various targets [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The measured complete fusion cross-sections are found to be suppressed compared to the Coupled Channel calculations or One Dimensional barrier penetration model calculations at above barrier energies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%