2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227312
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusion of augmented reality imaging with the endoscopic view for endonasal skull base surgery; a novel application for surgical navigation based on intraoperative cone beam computed tomography and optical tracking

Abstract: ObjectiveSurgical navigation is a well-established tool in endoscopic skull base surgery. However, navigational and endoscopic views are usually displayed on separate monitors, forcing the surgeon to focus on one or the other. Aiming to provide real-time integration of endoscopic and diagnostic imaging information, we present a new navigation technique based on augmented reality with fusion of intraoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) on the endoscopic view. The aim of this study was to evaluate the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This superimposition is displayed on a tablet, where the color of the virtual scalpel stick and an azimuth auxiliary circle increase the accuracy, intuitiveness, and efficiency of EVD surgery. The resulting accuracy is within 2.01 ± 1.12 mm, presenting a significant improvement over the optical positioning navigation (18.8 ± 8.56 mm) proposed by Ieiri et al [ 32 ], the mobile AR for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (7.9 mm) proposed by Müller et al [ 28 ], the phantom and porcine model AR evaluation (2.8 ± 2.7 and 3.52 ± 3.00 mm proposed by Kenngott et al [ 33 ], the AR imaging for endonasal skull base surgery (2.8 ± 2.7 mm) proposed by Lai et al [ 34 ], and the image positioning navigation (2.5 mm) proposed by Deng et al [ 35 ]. Table 3 shows that the proposed optical positioning method provided the best results in terms of average accuracy and standard deviation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This superimposition is displayed on a tablet, where the color of the virtual scalpel stick and an azimuth auxiliary circle increase the accuracy, intuitiveness, and efficiency of EVD surgery. The resulting accuracy is within 2.01 ± 1.12 mm, presenting a significant improvement over the optical positioning navigation (18.8 ± 8.56 mm) proposed by Ieiri et al [ 32 ], the mobile AR for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (7.9 mm) proposed by Müller et al [ 28 ], the phantom and porcine model AR evaluation (2.8 ± 2.7 and 3.52 ± 3.00 mm proposed by Kenngott et al [ 33 ], the AR imaging for endonasal skull base surgery (2.8 ± 2.7 mm) proposed by Lai et al [ 34 ], and the image positioning navigation (2.5 mm) proposed by Deng et al [ 35 ]. Table 3 shows that the proposed optical positioning method provided the best results in terms of average accuracy and standard deviation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, surgery can be simulated in a safe environment with lower associated costs. 22 Besides the use for pituitary-tumor surgery and brain biopsies, the head phantom would also be interesting for other types of procedures, including removal of brain and skull-base tumors, such as gliomas, meningiomas, chondrosarcomas or chordomas. 23,24 MR and CT images of either patients or cadavers with the mentioned pathologies could be used for creating the phantoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Wang et al 9 performed MR image fusion on CT scans by automatically detecting and tracking markers located on the patient skin, achieving a patient-to-image registration. Similarly, in Lai et al 10,11 CT images were overlaid on top of the endoscopic view, by using an optical tracking system for endoscope tracking to conduct experiments on a phantom model, reaching a good accuracy in tracking and rendering the augmented view. Thus, the fusion of MR information on optical cameras by directly tracking markers on a patient, can be used in this specific application to assess the patient position and correct for it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%