2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jterra.2013.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusion of driving and braking tire operational modes and analysis of traction dynamics and energy efficiency of a 4 × 4 loader

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mechanical front-wheel drive provides four-byfour capabilities to tractors with different-sized front and rear wheels. The use of a four-wheel drive system offers a number of advantages over two-wheel drive, mainly because it improves the tractor's ability to work in soft and wet soil and to cross slippery and uneven terrain (Patterson et al 2013;Stoilov, Kostadinov 2009;Wong 2009). However, as noted by Molari et al (2012), Vantsevich (2007) and Żebrowski (2010) under certain circumstances, when the surface of soil is dry and hard, there is a tendency for a MFWD tractors to suffer a reduction of efficiency in power delivery as a result of the interaction between front and rear axles being less than optimal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mechanical front-wheel drive provides four-byfour capabilities to tractors with different-sized front and rear wheels. The use of a four-wheel drive system offers a number of advantages over two-wheel drive, mainly because it improves the tractor's ability to work in soft and wet soil and to cross slippery and uneven terrain (Patterson et al 2013;Stoilov, Kostadinov 2009;Wong 2009). However, as noted by Molari et al (2012), Vantsevich (2007) and Żebrowski (2010) under certain circumstances, when the surface of soil is dry and hard, there is a tendency for a MFWD tractors to suffer a reduction of efficiency in power delivery as a result of the interaction between front and rear axles being less than optimal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the place where ballast weights are mounted and weight value, traction force can be increased by up to 15% (Janulevičius, Giedra 2008;Pranav, Pandey 2008). However, added weight increases the rolling resistance of the tires, so when weights are added, the effect on the rolling resistance should be taken into account (Patterson et al 2013;Stoilov, Kostadinov 2009;Taghavifar, Mardani 2013). This method also has another very important drawback -a danger always remains to compact the soil too much and damage its deep structure (much deeper than it is tilled), which can reduce soil productivity (Arvidsson, Keller 2007;Pranav, Pandey 2008;Taghavifar, Mardani 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subsequently, the final result is that the front wheels generate less braking torque and less braking force. Additional braking power losses occur in the transmission due to power circulation (Battiato, Diserens 2013;Patterson et al 2013); therefore, the increase of braking force of the rear wheels is lower than that of the reduction in the braking force of the front wheels. For the present case, the tractor braking power balance equation can be written down as follows:…”
Section: Theoretical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Besides, motor torque control is also available in HEVs and results showed that the algorithm works effectively during take-off and acceleration by controlling motor torque. 23 In addition, active braking control 23 and differential control 24 also have been introduced to TCS. From the above analysis, we can see that previous studies have successfully applied TCS to traditional vehicle and HEV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%