2013
DOI: 10.1094/cchem-01-13-0010-fi
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Future Cereal Starch Bioengineering: Cereal Ancestors Encounter Gene Technology and Designer Enzymes

Abstract: The importance of cereal starch production worldwide cannot be overrated. However, the qualities and resulting values of existing raw and processed starch do not fully meet future demands for environmentally friendly production of renewable, advanced biomaterials, functional foods, and biomedical additives. New approaches for starch bioengineering are needed. In this review, we discuss cereal starch from a combined universal bioresource point of view. The combination of new biotechniques and clean technology m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GWD2 and GWD3 were found in a wide range of organisms, while GWD2 was identified in very few higher plants, corroborating previous reports (Baunsgaard et al, 2005;Glaring et al, 2007). Unlike previously described (Glaring et al, 2007), GWD2 is not exclusive to dicots but also present in monocots, such as Brachypodium distachyon and Hordeum vulgare (Blennow et al, 2013;Radchuk et al, 2009;Tanackovic et al, 2014b). This result confirmed the assumption that the duplication of GWD occurred before divergence of monocots and dicots.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…GWD2 and GWD3 were found in a wide range of organisms, while GWD2 was identified in very few higher plants, corroborating previous reports (Baunsgaard et al, 2005;Glaring et al, 2007). Unlike previously described (Glaring et al, 2007), GWD2 is not exclusive to dicots but also present in monocots, such as Brachypodium distachyon and Hordeum vulgare (Blennow et al, 2013;Radchuk et al, 2009;Tanackovic et al, 2014b). This result confirmed the assumption that the duplication of GWD occurred before divergence of monocots and dicots.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Enzymatic modification of starch is gaining an interest as a clean and safe alternative to chemical modification (Blennow et al, 2013). Such enzymatic starch modification may be carried out either by the use of recombinant enzymes acting on purified starches, or alternatively the enzymes may be expressed directly in the starch producing crops by GM technology (Hebelstrup et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro, BE also catalyses a cyclisation reaction to form cyclo-amylose and cylo-amylopectin cluster (Kelly, Dijkhuizen and Leemhuis, 2009;. Starch modification with BE demonstrates an increase in solubility, reduced viscosity and for AM, increase degradative resistance of the product (Blennow et al, 2013). The thermostable BE from R. obamensis has drawn interest in starch modification to efficiently produce highly-branched α-glucans (Roussel et al, 2013;Shinohara et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degradation of sucrose derived from photosynthesis has also been included because of its significant contribution to the synthesis of ADP-glucose and seed sink strength. For the potential application of these enzymes for future cereal starch bioengineering and some other complementary information of, e.g., granule initiation and control of starch granule size, please refer to recent reviews like [4][5][6]. Throughout this review, affiliation of individual starch metabolizing enzymes to various families of glycoside hydrolases (GH) and glycosyl transferases (GT) as well as their carbohydrate-binding modules (CBM) reflects their classification within the CAZy database (http://www.cazy.org/).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%