2021
DOI: 10.1002/joc.7352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Future changes in the meteorological potential for winter haze over Beijing during periods of peak carbon emissions and carbon neutrality in China projected by Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 models

Abstract: Hazy conditions have a significant impact on the environment and societal development. Their occurrence and persistence depend largely on climatological conditions, including the important role of climate change. Based on monthly data from 15 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) models under three Tier 1 scenarios (SSP1–2.6, SSP2–4.5, and SSP5–8.5), the meteorological potential for winter haze pollution over Beijing was assessed during periods of peak carbon emissions (PCP; 2021–2030) and carb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(121 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CMIP6‐involved GCMs featured higher horizontal resolutions and more sophisticated physical parameterizations (Eyring et al, 2016, 2019), including historical simulations for the period of 1850–2014 and future projections after 2015 (here, we use outputs from 2015 to 2100), driven by various SSP scenarios in the Scenario Model Intercomparison Projection (ScenarioMIP; Eyring et al, 2016; O'Neill et al, 2016). The projections of the variables in the climate system depend on the scenario (e.g., Chen et al, 2020; Deng et al, 2022; J. Wang et al, 2022). The SSP scenarios were updated from the RCPs of the previous CMIP5 to overcome scientific gaps (Stouffer et al, 2017; van Vuuren et al, 2011), resulting in more reasonable future scenarios by combining diverse social, economic and environmental developments (O'Neill et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The CMIP6‐involved GCMs featured higher horizontal resolutions and more sophisticated physical parameterizations (Eyring et al, 2016, 2019), including historical simulations for the period of 1850–2014 and future projections after 2015 (here, we use outputs from 2015 to 2100), driven by various SSP scenarios in the Scenario Model Intercomparison Projection (ScenarioMIP; Eyring et al, 2016; O'Neill et al, 2016). The projections of the variables in the climate system depend on the scenario (e.g., Chen et al, 2020; Deng et al, 2022; J. Wang et al, 2022). The SSP scenarios were updated from the RCPs of the previous CMIP5 to overcome scientific gaps (Stouffer et al, 2017; van Vuuren et al, 2011), resulting in more reasonable future scenarios by combining diverse social, economic and environmental developments (O'Neill et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the MME mean was not only better than individual GCMs for the key variables (i.e., precipitation and Tasmax) in historical runs against the observations over the YRB but also reduced the uncertainties in the corresponding future projections (Yue et al, 2021). Such arithmetic averages across all model simulations and projections were extensively used to assess the performance of the CMIP6 models (e.g., J. Wang et al, 2022; Zha et al, 2023; Zhang & Chen, 2022). For fair comparisons with observations, the pressure‐level circulation data from CMIP6 outputs were bilinearly interpolated to a standard resolution of 2.5° × 2.5° before 9MME; meanwhile, the single‐level variables from CMIP6 outputs were bilinearly interpolated at a spatial resolution of T62 before 9MME, except for SM10cm, which was interpolated at a finer resolution of 1° × 1°.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation