2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Future developments in training

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In analogy to the observations made during scientific conferences, 9 it may create visibility of women and generate political momentum, potentially contributing to gender equity on other levels as well. 29 Gender disparities at all levels in medicine also have profound implications for society, as diversity in leadership positions is needed to reach balanced decisions and produce more representative health science. 19 Gender equity is therefore, besides being a matter of justice and rights for all, decisive for diversifying science to produce more rigorous research 30 and provide the best possible care to patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In analogy to the observations made during scientific conferences, 9 it may create visibility of women and generate political momentum, potentially contributing to gender equity on other levels as well. 29 Gender disparities at all levels in medicine also have profound implications for society, as diversity in leadership positions is needed to reach balanced decisions and produce more representative health science. 19 Gender equity is therefore, besides being a matter of justice and rights for all, decisive for diversifying science to produce more rigorous research 30 and provide the best possible care to patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of health, whether basic or continuous, knowledge is essential for the improvement of health care and the health system. 23,24 In the present study, health personnel exposed to training were estimated at 69.5% among personnel involved in transfusion. This shows that some health personnel transfuse when they have not been trained and this questions the safety of patients who receive the transfusion, the recruitment and management of blood donors and the entire transfusion chain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Possibly, the predominant disregard arises from the fact that at least 10 participants were male, which is an adequate depiction of the current sex ratio in the field: female medical professionals are still underrepresented as scientists and in senior positions. 25 , 26 Female health care providers and medical students consider sex and gender medicine more important than their male counterparts and they feel less prepared with regard to sex and gender competencies due to a lack of education in these skills and topics. 27–30 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%