Future Health Today: codesign of an electronic chronic disease quality improvement tool for use in general practice using a service design approach

Abstract

ObjectiveTo codesign an electronic chronic disease quality improvement tool for use in general practice.DesignService design employing codesign strategies.SettingGeneral practice.ParticipantsSeventeen staff (general practitioners, nurses and practice managers) from general practice in metropolitan Melbourne and regional Victoria and five patients from metropolitan Melbourne.InterventionsCodesign sessions with general practice staff, using a service design approach, were conducted to explore key design criteria and functionality of the audit and feedback and clinical decision support tools. Think aloud interviews were conducted in which participants articulated their thoughts of the resulting Future Health Today (FHT) prototype as they used it. One codesign session was held with patients. Using inductive and deductive coding, content and thematic analyses explored the development of a new technological platform and factors influencing implementation of the platform.ResultsParticipants identified that the prototype needed to work within their existing workflow to facilitate automated patient recall and track patients with or at-risk of specific conditions. It needed to be simple, provide visual snapshots of information and easy access to relevant guidelines and facilitate quality improvement activities. Successful implementation may be supported by: accuracy of the algorithms in FHT and data held in the practice; the platform supporting planned and spontaneous interactions with patients; the ability to hide tools; links to Medicare Benefits Schedule; and prefilled management plans. Participating patients supported the use of the platform in general practice. They suggested that use of the platform demonstrates a high level of patient care and could increase patient confidence in health practitioners.ConclusionStudy participants worked together to design a platform that is clear, simple, accurate and useful and that sits within any given general practice setting. The resulting FHT platform is currently being piloted in general practices and will continue to be refined based on user feedback.

Snakes and ladders: A qualitative study understanding the active ingredients of social interaction around the use of audit and feedback

“…The resulting misalignment between the focus of the ­intervention and physicians’ existing skill sets and perceived job role (i.e., focusing on care patient-by-patient) undermines potential impact [ 21 ]. This suggests that co-design efforts should extend to include the development of strategies that address this misalignment [ 22 ]. Furthermore, the co-design process enabled Cooke et al to determine and communicate the topic of the session in advance.…”

Evaluation of a Digital Self-management Platform for Patients With Chronic Illness in Primary Care: Qualitative Study of Stakeholders’ Perspectives

“…Feedback was considered particularly necessary to ensure that patients know they are not measuring for nothing. Indeed, feedback is essential to achieve behavior change or ensure that patients take their medications and measurements [ 38 ]. Moreover, users were positive about the platform during this development phase, but they were neutral about whether they will use it regularly.…”

Symptomatic cancer diagnosis in general practice: a critical perspective of current guidelines and risk assessment tools

“…Future Health Today (FHT), a quality improvement tool, is being evaluated in Australian general practices through randomised trials. 28 FHT is integrated into general practice electronic medical records to enhance management of a range of medical conditions, including cancer-specific modules to identify patients potentially at risk of undiagnosed cancer by flagging abnormal test results. Other eCDS are being used in some primary health networks but are yet to be evaluated using randomised trials.…”