1979
DOI: 10.1016/0094-5765(79)90004-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Future low-cost space transportation system analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, the problem can be written as follows: max š‘›ā‰„1 š‘… š‘  (š‘”; š‘›) subject to šø (š¶; š‘›) ā‰¤ š‘ š‘¢ where šø(š¶; š‘›) is the expected development cost of a system of š‘› components and š‘ š‘¢ is the maximum available cost. For example, if the power function, šø(š¶; š‘›) = 16.6(š‘‰ š‘› ) 0.4 , is fitted to scale the engine development cost in terms of the design thrust value, 28,30 the optimal solution is obtained directly from the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker condition, independently and dependently of the assumed lifetime distribution when using Equations ( 4) and ( 5) to express š‘… š‘  (š‘”; š‘›), respectively.…”
Section: Analytical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, the problem can be written as follows: max š‘›ā‰„1 š‘… š‘  (š‘”; š‘›) subject to šø (š¶; š‘›) ā‰¤ š‘ š‘¢ where šø(š¶; š‘›) is the expected development cost of a system of š‘› components and š‘ š‘¢ is the maximum available cost. For example, if the power function, šø(š¶; š‘›) = 16.6(š‘‰ š‘› ) 0.4 , is fitted to scale the engine development cost in terms of the design thrust value, 28,30 the optimal solution is obtained directly from the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker condition, independently and dependently of the assumed lifetime distribution when using Equations ( 4) and ( 5) to express š‘… š‘  (š‘”; š‘›), respectively.…”
Section: Analytical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the problem can be written as follows: maxnbadbreakā‰„1Rs()t;n0.33emsubjectto0.33emE()C;nbadbreakā‰¤cu$$\begin{equation}\mathop {\max }\limits_{n \ge 1} {R_s}\left( {t;n} \right)\ {\rm{subject\ \ to}}\ E\left( {C;n} \right) \le {c_u}\end{equation}$$where Efalse(C;nfalse)$E( {C;n} )$ is the expected development cost of a system of n components and cu${c_u}$ is the maximum available cost. For example, if the power function, E(C;n)=16.6false(Vnfalse)0.4,$E ( {C;n} ) = 16.6{( {{V_n}} )^{0.4}},$ is fitted to scale the engine development cost in terms of the design thrust value, 28,30 the optimal solution is obtained directly from the Karushā€“Kuhnā€“Tucker condition, independently and dependently of the assumed lifetime distribution when using Equations () and () to express Rs(t;n)${R_s}( {t;n} )$, respectively.…”
Section: Analytical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%