2014
DOI: 10.1080/1360144x.2013.848357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Future perfect? Conflict and agency in higher education reform in Poland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of this approach is that it remains relatively easy to keep an overarching perspective of practice and to see the practice as part of a larger whole. This approach also requires less commitment, but perhaps also a lack of agency (Saroyan, 2014) and feelings of alienation (Szkudlarek & Stankiewicz, 2014). On the other hand, one can engage fully with practice and thus see all of the complexities intertwined in the specific practice; however, this comes at the risk of losing the overarching perspective and possibly of setting aside values and losing the ability to easily make links to other practices and to theory.…”
Section: An Emerging Framework For the Integration Of Theory And Pracmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of this approach is that it remains relatively easy to keep an overarching perspective of practice and to see the practice as part of a larger whole. This approach also requires less commitment, but perhaps also a lack of agency (Saroyan, 2014) and feelings of alienation (Szkudlarek & Stankiewicz, 2014). On the other hand, one can engage fully with practice and thus see all of the complexities intertwined in the specific practice; however, this comes at the risk of losing the overarching perspective and possibly of setting aside values and losing the ability to easily make links to other practices and to theory.…”
Section: An Emerging Framework For the Integration Of Theory And Pracmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These arguments imply that universities are excessively addicted to what they are used to. As disruptive innovation is, by nature, against such inertia, it is not difficult to understand why there are so many challenges and conflicts in the process of paradigm change in higher education, as observed by many higher education researchers (See, for example, Sturgeon, 2012;Szkudlarek & Stankiewicz, 2014;Tuunainen, 2002). Thus "the university's innovation must be informed by self-awareness and by an understanding of history" (Christensen & Eyring, 2011, p. xxv).…”
Section: Nature Of Innovation In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HE functions as an ideological framework [32] for reforms, positioning it at the forefront of the shift from the old to a potentially new regime. Policy implementation is a site in which reform policies interact in the existing social milieu, which "allows for diverse interpretations of agency and power and, in consequence, for complex patterns of compliance and resistance" [33] (p.37). Post-Soviet countries provide examples of the key role HE can have in developing unstable states [34,35].…”
Section: Policy Reform In Unstable Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%