2019
DOI: 10.1111/imr.12812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Future prospects for CD8+ regulatory T cells in immune tolerance

Abstract: CD8+ Tregs have been long described and significant progresses have been made about their phenotype, their functional mechanisms, and their suppressive ability compared to conventional CD4+ Tregs. They are now at the dawn of their clinical use. In this review, we will summarize their phenotypic characteristics, their mechanisms of action, the similarities, differences and synergies between CD8+ and CD4+ Tregs, and we will discuss the biology, development and induction of CD8+ Tregs, their manufacturing for cli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 215 publications
(385 reference statements)
0
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We obtained more than an 100fold expansion of CD8 + Tregs with either IL-34-differentiated macrophages (named IL-34-Tregs) or untreated macrophages (named Tregs) ( Figure 5E). After expansion, IL-34-Tregs were highly enriched in FOXP3 + cells, expressed higher levels of surface markers commonly related to CD4 + and CD8 + Tregs, such as GITR and PD-1, and cytokines such as TGFβ, IFNγ, and IL-34 that we have demonstrated as being mediators of CD8 + Treg-suppressive activity (23,24) (Figure 5F and Supplementary Figure 4B).…”
Section: Il-34 Induces More Efficiently Than Csf-1 Foxp3 + Tregs Whmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We obtained more than an 100fold expansion of CD8 + Tregs with either IL-34-differentiated macrophages (named IL-34-Tregs) or untreated macrophages (named Tregs) ( Figure 5E). After expansion, IL-34-Tregs were highly enriched in FOXP3 + cells, expressed higher levels of surface markers commonly related to CD4 + and CD8 + Tregs, such as GITR and PD-1, and cytokines such as TGFβ, IFNγ, and IL-34 that we have demonstrated as being mediators of CD8 + Treg-suppressive activity (23,24) (Figure 5F and Supplementary Figure 4B).…”
Section: Il-34 Induces More Efficiently Than Csf-1 Foxp3 + Tregs Whmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The synergy between IL-34 and anti-CD45RC mAb also suggests that in vivo IL-34 efficacy may be limited by Teff cells. Although the synergistic capacity of CD4 + and CD8 + Tregs is not yet clear, both subsets could show complementary effects and it could be beneficial to administer them together to patients (24). IL-34 could also be used in vivo together with Treg cell therapy to promote the persistence and the function of the induced Tregs, as is done with low-dose IL-2 or rapamycin (52,53), by enrichment of the environment with tolerogenic macrophages and by direct action on Tregs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent interest in CD8+ Treg lead to their phenotypic and functional characterization [ 65 , 66 , 67 ]. CD8+ Treg have shown to play an important role in immune homeostasis, including inhibition of B-cell proliferation and differentiation of B cells into immunoglobulin-secreting plasmablasts [ 67 , 68 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that CD8 + and CD4 + Tregs recognize their cognate antigens presented by major histocompatibility complex class I molecule (MHC-I) or MHC-II on relevant cell types, respectively. Hence, CD8 + Tregs will display their suppressive activities on virtually all cells, whereas CD4 + Tregs' suppressive abilities will occur only on cells expressing MHC-II molecules [31]. Based on these, we think it very important to investigate the functional mechanisms of CD8 + Tregs and to exploit the CD8 + Treg-cell therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%