2022
DOI: 10.37708/psyct.v15i1.640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Future Time Perspective, Procrastination and Academic Motivation in Argentinian College Students During the Pandemic

Abstract: Numerous studies have addressed psychological aspects of students’ life during the pandemic; however, data related to the role of future time perspective and sociodemographic differences -age and gender- in the relationship with procrastination and motivation is scarce. It was hypothesized that the relationship between future time perspective and procrastination would be negative, but positive with motivation, and that age and gender would have a differential moderating effect on those. This study was online a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could explain why people high in this time perspective might display a more rational approach to decision-making that implies an organized and conscientious way of dealing with every step of their planned behavior. This would be the opposite of non-vigilant decisional styles -particularly procrastination-since it has a negative relationship with self-regulation such as self-control and intrinsic motivation (Brenlla et al, 2022;Ferrari et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could explain why people high in this time perspective might display a more rational approach to decision-making that implies an organized and conscientious way of dealing with every step of their planned behavior. This would be the opposite of non-vigilant decisional styles -particularly procrastination-since it has a negative relationship with self-regulation such as self-control and intrinsic motivation (Brenlla et al, 2022;Ferrari et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%