2014
DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2014.936629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Future year ozone source attribution modeling studies for the eastern and western United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences between tagging and brute force methods are usually observed in secondary processes involving precursors from different sources. Some comparison studies (Collet et al, 2014;Koo et al, 2009) indicate that tagging is advantageous for source allocation rather than for predicting responses to emissions changes.…”
Section: Discussion Of Uncertainties and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences between tagging and brute force methods are usually observed in secondary processes involving precursors from different sources. Some comparison studies (Collet et al, 2014;Koo et al, 2009) indicate that tagging is advantageous for source allocation rather than for predicting responses to emissions changes.…”
Section: Discussion Of Uncertainties and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tagged species methods, such as the Ozone and Particulate Source Apportionment Technology (OSAT/PSAT) in CAMx (Dunker et al, 2002;Yarwood et al, 2007), can effi-P. Karamchandani et al: Source-sector contributions to European ozone ciently track contributions from many source sectors and/or regions and provide source contributions that sum to the total concentration. These methods are increasingly being used to help understand complex air quality issues (e.g., Wagstrom et al, 2008;Burr and Zhang, 2011;Baker and Kelly, 2014;Collet et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2009;Li et al, 2012;Skyllakou et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the primary emitted particles in the ship exhaust, secondary particles are formed in the atmosphere by oxidation of emitted gaseous precursors -nitrogen oxides (NO x ) and sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) -during the dispersion of the ship exhaust. Mainly by contributing to the ambient levels of fine particulate matter, PM 2.5 (particles with a diameter of less than 2.5 µm), emissions from ship traffic are responsible for a large number of premature deaths globally (Corbett et al, 2007). According to Sofiev et al (2018b), the worldwide use of cleaner marine fuels with a lower content of sulfur will strongly reduce the ship-related premature mortality and morbidity by 34 % and 54 %, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%