2023
DOI: 10.3390/math11204381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy Assessment of Management Consulting Projects: Model Validation and Case Studies

Hongyi Sun,
Wenbin Ni,
Lanxuan Huang

Abstract: Management consulting (MC) has been heavily involved in emerging business opportunities in mainland China. However, there are no well-known local MC project management models to help evaluate whether an MC project can be successful or not. This paper reports a model for the self-assessment of management consulting projects, which has been validated by 15 experts and 13 cases. The new model, with seven factors that are critical to the success of MC projects, was developed from a literature review. The model was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further validate the application of the model, this study conducts case studies involving a completed technology transfer collaboration project and an ongoing project. In order to combine evidence from different sources, including the opinions of various experts, and to address the uncertainty inherent in fuzzy assessment [61], the Dempster-Shafer evidence method is utilized. This approach allows for a more comprehensive understanding and consideration of multiple perspectives in the evaluation process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further validate the application of the model, this study conducts case studies involving a completed technology transfer collaboration project and an ongoing project. In order to combine evidence from different sources, including the opinions of various experts, and to address the uncertainty inherent in fuzzy assessment [61], the Dempster-Shafer evidence method is utilized. This approach allows for a more comprehensive understanding and consideration of multiple perspectives in the evaluation process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%