2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics 2009
DOI: 10.1109/robio.2009.4913112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy based Gains Tuning of PD controller for joint position control of AIT Leg Exoskeleton-I (ALEX-I)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Body COM of the ALEX is shifted to the supported foot, before the right swing is generated. At this point, authors noticed that constraints on the actual designed joint angles at the ankle have to be exceeded [8]. However, the gaits data could be achieved in the simulation module.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Body COM of the ALEX is shifted to the supported foot, before the right swing is generated. At this point, authors noticed that constraints on the actual designed joint angles at the ankle have to be exceeded [8]. However, the gaits data could be achieved in the simulation module.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ALEX has been developed in 2006 by Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), Thailand. The mechanical details have been discussed in [7,8]. In general, ALEX has 12 DOF (6 DOF on each leg: 3 at the hip, 1 at the knee and 2 at the ankle), controlled by 12 DC motors.…”
Section: Further Gaits Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, because intelligent algorithms, such as neural network and fuzzy theory, do not require precise mathematical models with a great adaptability to the inputs from outside, a few scientists adopt these intelligent algorithms to develop controllers for exoskeletons. 14,17,18 As motioned earlier, intelligent algorithms need a large amount of calculation during the control process, which require high speed computers. To make the control system more adaptive and keep a small amount of calculation, it is easy to think about developing an algorithm which combines intelligent algorithms with traditional algorithms.…”
Section: The Control Methodology Of Exoskeletons a Brief Survey On Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Researchers have to face these difficulties above. Traditional control algorithms [12][13][14] in exoskeleton systems are designed for a special exoskeleton, operator or motion, which need great efforts and have weak universality. With great adaptability to imprecise models, intelligent algorithms, such as fuzzy theory, find wide applications in the field of robots, 15 which also attract the interest of exoskeleton researchers in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the above control algorithms are implemented in real applications, a long and tedious tuning of control gains is often required to achieve desired system performances. Despite the large number of gain optimization procedures for classical dynamical systems (see, e.g., [14], [15]) gain optimization techniques for floating base systems, and in particular in the field of humanoid robots, still needs more investigations. Preliminary results in this direction consist in applying classical LQR approaches to the linearized humanoid robot dynamics [16], [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%