Information Sciences 2007 2007
DOI: 10.1142/9789812709677_0199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy C-Mean Algorithm Based on Mahalanobis Distances and Better Initial Values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gath and Geva (1989) [9] assumed that the normal distribution with expected value and covariance matrix is chosen for generating a datum with prior probability, satisfying…”
Section: Gg Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Gath and Geva (1989) [9] assumed that the normal distribution with expected value and covariance matrix is chosen for generating a datum with prior probability, satisfying…”
Section: Gg Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Fuzzy C-Means algorithm based on adaptive Mahalanobis distances, common Mahalanobis distance and standardized Mahalanobis distance, respectively (FCM-M and FCM-CM), [8][9][10][11][12]13] were proposed, and then, the fuzzy covariance matrices in the Mahalanobis distance can be directly derived by minimizing the objective function. In our three previous works, to add a regulating factor of Each covariance matrix to each class in the objective function, and deleted the constraint of the determinants of covariance matrices in the GK algorithm, the Fuzzy C-Means algorithm based on adaptive Mahalanobis distances, common Mahalanobis distance and standardized Mahalanobis distance, respectively (FCM-M and FCM-CM), [8][9][10][11][12]13] were proposed, and then, the fuzzy covariance matrices in the Mahalanobis distance can be directly derived by minimizing the objective function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An improved implementation (to be investigated in the future) would include a different covariance matrix for each class and thus require iterative updates of based on the class membership at each iteration [11].…”
Section: Modified Fcm For Healthy and Abnormal Tissue Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A regulating factor of the covariance matrix is added to each class in the objective function, and the constraint of the determinant of the covariance matrices defined in the G-K algorithm is removed. Furthermore, the FCM-AM algorithms included two algorithms, FCM-M and FCM-CM, proposed by our previous works (Hsiang-Chuan Liu, Jeng-Ming Yih, Shin-Wu Liu, 2007). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%