2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy Index to Evaluate Edge Detection in Digital Images

Abstract: In literature, we can find different metrics to evaluate the detected edges in digital images, like Pratt's figure of merit (FOM), Jaccard’s index (JI) and Dice’s coefficient (DC). These metrics compare two images, the first one is the reference edges image, and the second one is the detected edges image. It is important to mention that all existing metrics must binarize images before their evaluation. Binarization step causes information to be lost because an incomplete image is being evaluated. In this paper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental results are shown in Tables 1 and 2. To assess the performance of the four edge detection methods, there are many estimation indicators, such as reference [42][43][44], in the paper, in order to accurately evaluate the performance of improved edge detection method, the evaluation indices used in a previous study [45] were used for comparison, and the experimental results are shown in Tables 3-6. For the sake of convenience, the following tables use one-hundredth of a second as the time unit.…”
Section: Objective Comparison Of the Experimental Results Obtainedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental results are shown in Tables 1 and 2. To assess the performance of the four edge detection methods, there are many estimation indicators, such as reference [42][43][44], in the paper, in order to accurately evaluate the performance of improved edge detection method, the evaluation indices used in a previous study [45] were used for comparison, and the experimental results are shown in Tables 3-6. For the sake of convenience, the following tables use one-hundredth of a second as the time unit.…”
Section: Objective Comparison Of the Experimental Results Obtainedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the first two images, an FD = 0.2 was assigned for each gradient, while for the last three images an FD = 0.6 was used. To evaluate the efficiency of the proposed edge detection method, the metric based on the "Figure of merit" of Pratt's (FOM) [37][38][39] was used. FOM values are between 0 and 1 (If the result of the FOM is 1 or very close to 1, this means that the detected edge is the same or very similar to the reference image.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method however is noted as the first performance evaluation without ground truth that analyses the structure of edges. Ornelas et al (2015) proposed fuzzy index for performance evaluation. They argued that current methods of edge performance evaluation discard critical information contained in pixel level since they normally operate in edge map which is known as a binary image.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%