2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10700-013-9166-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy interaction regression for short term load forecasting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on Hong and Wang's approach [20] Hong and Wang's approach [20] is used here as it was developed to generate both linear and nonlinear fuzzy regression models. Figure 2c, which increase from levels 1 to 4 and decrease from levels 4 to 6.…”
Section: Fuzzy Regression For Aesthetic Quality Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on Hong and Wang's approach [20] Hong and Wang's approach [20] is used here as it was developed to generate both linear and nonlinear fuzzy regression models. Figure 2c, which increase from levels 1 to 4 and decrease from levels 4 to 6.…”
Section: Fuzzy Regression For Aesthetic Quality Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These fuzzy regression models [4,8,15,16,18,19,20,21,24 A the increasing magnitudes of objective features. The assumption may suit instrumentation measurements because the amount of uncertainty increases when measurement magnitudes increase [43].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intrusive and nonintrusive load monitoring and prediction approaches are mentioned in [18]. Fuzzy regression model is proposed by Hong and Wang [19] for STLF; the authors used historical, weekday, and temperature information for the 3-year dataset and then formulated three fuzzy linear regression models. Mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was in the range of 2.6-4.58% for hourly peak load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exponential smoothing method reported by Weron et al [23], the gray forecast method reported by Li et al [24] based on time trend extrapolation reported by Ismail et al [25], the clustering forecast method reported by Kodogiannis et al [26] and multiple regression analysis method reported by Hong et al [27] based on the load related factor analysis cannot ensure the satisfactory result in any case. In order to make full use of the advantages and the contained information of each single forecast model, combination forecast [28][29][30][31][32][33] is an effective method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the production process of a new particle swarm, the particle position is updated according to Equation (27), and the step length is represented by Equation (26). The coefficients of the three parts in Equation (26) are randomly changed, but only the rules of the particle to follow the order are changed.…”
Section: Introducing Disturbance Variable Into Ia-psomentioning
confidence: 99%