Fuzzy rankings for preferences modeling in group decision making

Abstract

Although fuzzy preference relations (FPRs) are among the most commonly used preference models in group decision making (GDM), they are not free from drawbacks. First of all, especially when dealing with many alternatives, the definition of FPRs becomes complex and time consuming. Moreover, they allow to focus on only two options at a time. This facilitates the expression of preferences but let experts lose the global perception of the problem with the risk of introducing inconsistencies that impact negatively on the whole decision process. For these reasons, different preference models are often adopted in real GDM settings and, if necessary, transformation functions are applied to obtain equivalent FPRs. In this paper, we propose fuzzy rankings, a new approximate preference model that offers a higher level of user‐friendliness with respect to FPRs while trying to maintain an adequate level of expressiveness. Fuzzy rankings allow experts to focus on two alternatives at a time without losing the global picture so reducing inconsistencies. Conversion algorithms from fuzzy rankings to FPRs and backward are defined as well as similarity measures, useful when evaluating the concordance between experts’ opinion. A comparison of the proposed model with related works is reported as well as several explicative examples.

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Online education satisfaction assessment based on cloud model and fuzzy TOPSIS

“…Furthermore, the assessment of online education can be seen as a multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM) problem. MCGDM has been widely studied since it has applications in many fields, and several approaches have been proposed so far for the representation of experts’ preference, for their aggregation, for the selection of the best alternative and for consensus reaching [ 16 – 19 ]. There is need to develop a methodology for integrating the uncertainty of the online education assessment.…”

Learning decision trees for the partial label ranking problem

“…There are multiple variants of this problem, depending on the type of input rankings, the function to be optimized and the type of consensus ranking to be obtained. The problem of aggregating rankings plays an important role in decision‐making, 5,16,19,20 which is a topic that attracts much interest in the social sciences, such as economics, management, psychology, and so forth.…”

An influence-driven feedback system for preference similarity network clustering based consensus group decision making model

“…, e m } uses their knowledge, experience and expertise to express their opinions with the aim of achieving a final decision with sufficient agreement from every group member. When pairwise comparing alternatives, experts assign to each alternative an intensity of preference degree towards any other alternative [31]. Mathematically, this preference representation is modelled using a reciprocal fuzzy preference relation (RFPR) on A, i.e.…”