2012
DOI: 10.1002/int.21552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy resource-constrained project scheduling using taboo search algorithm

Abstract: This paper proposes a mathematical model to deal with project scheduling problem under vagueness and a framework of a heuristic approach to fuzzy resource‐constrained project scheduling problem (F‐RCPSP) using heuristic and metaheuristic scheduling methods. Our approach is very simple to apply, and it does not require knowing the explicit form of the membership functions of the fuzzy activity times. We first identify two typical activity priority rules, namely, resource over time and minimum slack priority rul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expect for the stochastic factor mentioned above (objective uncertainty) which is from external cause (such as treacherous weather and equipment failure), the other one is from internal (such as the perception and dissension of decision makers) in the scheduling process, i.e., subjective uncertainty, and it can be cope with fuzzy theory. Following the study of Prade (1979) [34], which is first applied fuzzy theory to the project scheduling problems in 1979, many researchers considered the fuzzy factors in MRCPSP, such as Chen et al (2011) [9], Bhaskar et al (2011) [7], Atli and Kahraman (2012) [4]. However, the objective and subjective uncertainty are considered as separate aspects in the above literatures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expect for the stochastic factor mentioned above (objective uncertainty) which is from external cause (such as treacherous weather and equipment failure), the other one is from internal (such as the perception and dissension of decision makers) in the scheduling process, i.e., subjective uncertainty, and it can be cope with fuzzy theory. Following the study of Prade (1979) [34], which is first applied fuzzy theory to the project scheduling problems in 1979, many researchers considered the fuzzy factors in MRCPSP, such as Chen et al (2011) [9], Bhaskar et al (2011) [7], Atli and Kahraman (2012) [4]. However, the objective and subjective uncertainty are considered as separate aspects in the above literatures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since maximization of ranking fuzzy objective function leads to the same result in comparison with maximization of the fuzzy objective function, the fuzzy objective function can be substituted with its ranking in Eq. 8as follows [32]:…”
Section: Calculating Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [31] considered fuzzy RCPSP and solved it with an e cient genetic algorithm and compared the di erent solutions gained by di erent ranking methods of fuzzy numbers. Atli and Kahraman [32] proposed a mathematical model to deal with project scheduling problem under vagueness and provided a framework of a heuristic approach for Fuzzy Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem (F-RCPSP) using heuristic and metaheuristic scheduling methods. Kaur and Kumar [33] provided a fuzzy arithmetic in fully fuzzy linear programming for getting an optimal solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, uncertainty of the project parameters may not be handled by random variables due to the lack of statistical past data. In this case, fuzzy set theory may be a useful tool to study the project scheduling problems [3]. For this reason, fuzzy set theory can be easily utilized in such cases where the uncertain project parameters are estimated by project managers based on their expertise, knowledge and judgements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a human expertise on these uncertain parameters may generally involve ambiguous or vague information which cannot be modelled by using stochastic or probabilistic approaches. Moreover, as it was emphasized by Atli and Kahraman [3]- [4] that some of the stochastic project scheduling models are generally computationally too expensive and theoretically too complex. For this reason, it is difficult to apply them to solve practical large-scaled project scheduling problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%